Blogs Comment On Vice Presidential Debate; International Women's Health; Religion And Election; Roe
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyAlso Included In: Sexual Health / STDs; Abortion
Article Date: 01 Oct 2008 - 9:00 PDT
The following summarizes recent women's health-related blog entries.
~ "The Palin-Biden Debate: Betting on Resurgent Social Issues," Scott Swenson, RH Reality Check: Social issues, such as abortion and sex education, are "certain to come up" during Thursday's vice presidential debate between Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska), Swenson writes in a blog entry. He adds that it "would be refreshing if social conservatives would stop focusing on imposing one narrow religious interpretation on the entire country and start working on common-sense policies supporting proven medical science and public health strategies to educate people with facts and prevent unwanted pregnancies" and sexually transmitted infections. According to Swenson, when social issues come up during the debate, Palin will "use her moment in the spotlight to jump on them in dramatic fashion as this week's ... gamble to shake up the race" by Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). Palin's "goal" would be to "demonstrate conviction and to make it harder for certain blocs of voters to abandon McCain" rather than "persuade people about the issue," Swenson writes, adding that the tactic would target voters in swing states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania. The McCain-Palin campaign "must hold onto Culture War voters who, because of real concerns about the economy, may consider voting for" Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Biden, Swenson writes, adding that the "gamble" is that "moderates will be made uncomfortable by a continuation of Culture War politics." Swenson concludes that a "real debate between two national leaders thinking big thoughts about the problems that face us, and how each ticket plans to lift all Americans up" can be hoped for by viewers, "[o]r we can have the next battle of the social conservative Culture War. Which bet do you think McCain is making?" (Swenson, RH Reality Check, 9/30).
~ "International Women's Health? Who's President Makes the Difference," Craig Lasher, RH Reality Check: The next president's ability to maintain or rescind the Mexico City Policy, also known as the 'Global Gag Rule,' as well as to determine the country's contribution to the United Nations Population Fund, reflects how greatly the person who occupies the White House can affect "what policies govern international family planning and reproductive health programs and how much money is spent on these critical health activities," Lasher writes in a blog entry. For instance, the Mexico City Policy "has been a ping pong ball that has bounced back and forth depending on who was in the White House," according to Lasher. In addition, although President Bush for the last seven years has used "an overly broad interpretation of the so-called Kemp-Kasten amendment, which prohibits funding to any organization that 'supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization,'" President Clinton's administration "employed a different and more narrow and proper interpretation of the statute to allow U.S. funds to flow to UNFPA during his tenure." Lasher concludes, "Bottom line, whether it is policymaking or funding for U.S. involvement in family planning and reproductive health programs around the world, the president matters -- and matters greatly" (Lasher, RH Reality Check, 9/29).
~ "Obama Talks Faith, McCain Claims 'Values'," George McHendry, Jr., Huffington Post: In the blog entry, McHendry examines the way in which both Obama and McCain discuss religion. McHendry writes that although McCain's positions, such as his opposition to abortion rights, "line up with conservative evangelical issues," they "lack connections to faith." McHendry adds, "McCain fails to talk about faith in a coherent way beyond the marquee issue of abortion and lip service to the mailable 'family values.'" On the other hand, according to McHendry, Obama disagrees with conservative evangelicals on abortion, but he "demonstrates clear connections to the faith community," particularly because he "does not shy away from direct appeals to believers," is "comfortable talking about faith," and "does so in a way that allows Christian values to govern individuals, but not be canonized into law" (McHendry, Huffington Post, 9/29).
~ "Hyperbole Times Five," Jacki Ragan, National Right to Life Committee: During every presidential election year a "squadron of 'horror stories' flies in, dropping warnings about what allegedly would happen should Roe v. Wade be overturned," Ragan writes in a blog entry in reaction to a recent interview given by Washington Post writer Linda Hirshman. "It's the usual hyperbole times five -- one for every week until the American public decides between" McCain and Obama, Ragan writes. Ragan writes that she has "no quarrel with pro-abortionists making their 'best case' for why it is acceptable -- indeed to them, a good thing -- that thousands of babies are slaughtered each and every day." She adds, "But why not at least take a pass at understanding why there is even more resistance today to abortion on demand" than when Roe was decided. Ragan concludes that it would be "fair to ask whether Betty Friedan herself may have eventually worried whether the modern feminist movement had gone overboard in putting abortion advocacy at the top of its priority list" (Ragan, National Right to Life Committee, 9/29).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/123664.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/123664.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Palin Has Passion
posted by catherine on 2 Oct 2008 at 9:51 pmJust watched the Vice Presidential debates. I have been undecided for quite a while, since I have been of voting age, as a matter of fact. I have been dissappointed with the choices given for a long time, as we do not live in a democracy, but a republic. For the first time, I support a candidate. Surprisingly, it is not the main person on the ticket.
The opening of de debate was NOT in Palin’s favor. She seemed extremely nervous next to Biden’s confident demeanor. Many issues with conflicting sides. Ultimately, I feel that Palin wins all. Not because she is a Republican, not because she is a politician, and certainly not because she is a woman, but because of the PASSION she expresses. When was the last time you truly believed a presidential candidate??? Palin believes she can make a difference. Our founding fathers believed they could make a difference, spent their fortunes proving it, and gave us a country. Palin believes she can make a difference.
Does it really matter what the issues are? Most presidents have made many hollow campaign promises and delivered nothing. There have been a select few presidents who have done great things. The difference here is that she is passionate about what she does. Without that passion, she would be no different than any candidate who has run before her for many years.
Obama talks about change. The only evidence I have seen that he is up for change is his continuous change of opinion. Biden stands behind him. Both “Yes Men.” Palin is a driver of change and reform, as is evidenced in her governorship. We want our country back!!! We want our government to care about its people again. If elected, Obama will be like Clinton: driven by his wife and cabinet, relying on others for the answers. Palin has her own answers.
Well, she is an unknown coming in as the Vice Presidential candidate on someone else’s ticket. So what? She is not the kind of person to agree with someone just because she is a running mate. I feel that she will be the “checks and balances” needed for an effective term. She will stand up for the rights of Americans everywhere and make sure that the greed of government is called to trial, so to speak.
US Politicians Are All The Same
posted by Greg Hadsmith on 3 Oct 2008 at 12:11 amIn the USA politics is all about flim-flam, packaging, the spin. None of it is about policy. They have absolutely no idea what to say tomorrow, and decide that according to what is going on during that day.
Their arguments are infantile. There is no debating anymore. Just packaging and spin. Heaven help us!!
I really believe our time is over. We are witnessing a turning point in history, when another part of the world starts pushing us out of top stop. Sadly, nobody seems to realize this.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




