Disturbing Trend In Treating Recurrent Breast Cancer Discovered By UC Davis Researchers
Main Category: Breast CancerArticle Date: 03 Oct 2008 - 3:00 PDT
A majority of women with breast cancer today are candidates for lumpectomy, allowing for conservation of most of their breast tissue. Results of a UC Davis study, however, show that a number of women whose cancer recurs in the same breast are treated with a second lumpectomy rather than a mastectomy, defying current treatment recommendations and cutting the number of years those women survive in half.
"We were surprised to find that so many women in our study - almost a quarter of them - had received another lumpectomy rather than a mastectomy," said Steven Chen, a UC Davis Cancer Center surgical oncologist and lead author of the study, which appears in the October issue of the American Journal of Surgery. "It's likely that patients are asking for lumpectomies when their cancer is diagnosed a second time, and their doctors are simply complying with that request. Whatever the reason, that decision can shorten life spans."
Chen and study co-author, Steve Martinez, also a UC Davis Cancer Center surgical oncologist, gathered data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, which includes information on all cancers diagnosed in selected regions throughout the nation. Their study included 747 patients who previously received breast-conservation therapy and were diagnosed with cancer a second time in the same breast between 1988 and 2004.
The authors found that women who had mastectomies had a 78 percent survival rate after five years, while those who had second lumpectomies had a 67 percent survival rate. The 10-year survival rates were 62 percent for those who had mastectomies and 57 percent for those who had second lumpectomies. In all, 24 percent of women with recurrent breast cancer in the same breast had second lumpectomies.
The researchers went on to calculate the risk of dying for mastectomy patients compared to lumpectomy patients. They found that, after adjusting for factors that affect survival, there will be half as many survivors at any given time in the lumpectomy group versus the mastectomy group.
Chen explained that a mastectomy is the generally accepted surgical treatment for a second cancer because whole breast radiation, which typically accompanies a lumpectomy, is not usually recommended twice in a lifetime. This new study shows as well that there is a survival advantage to those who choose a mastectomy.
According to Martinez, knowledge of breast cancer and its treatments are continuously advancing, and second lumpectomies could at some point become a viable option.
"As therapy for breast cancer becomes more targeted and researchers come closer to identifying those factors that make some breast cancers more aggressive than others, we may have the option of recommending second and even third lumpectomies in select cases in the future. Until then, mastectomy remains the best option for women experiencing a same-breast recurrence of their breast cancer," he said.
###
Breast cancer is currently the most common newly diagnosed malignancy among American women. The chance of developing invasive breast cancer at some time in a woman's life is about 1 in 8. In the United States in 2008, an estimated 182,460 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed, an additional 67,770 new cases of carcinoma in situ - or "pre-cancer" - will be discovered and 40,480 women will die from breast cancer.
Designated by the National Cancer Institute, UC Davis Cancer Center cares for 9,000 adults and children each year from throughout the Central Valley and inland Northern California. The center's Breast Cancer Program provides comprehensive, multidisciplinary services for patients with all stages of the disease. Patients receive their care in one location, from a team of top academic physicians with expertise in hematology and oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, plastic and reconstructive surgery, and diagnostic radiology/mammography. These experts work together to develop individualized treatment plans for each patient. For more information, visit http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/cancer/.
Source: Karen Finney
University of California - Davis - Health System
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/124108.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/124108.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Time For Medical Community To Recognize Its Bias
posted by Gail Perry on 3 Oct 2008 at 5:28 amWhen I was diagnosed with breast cancer, every single medical professional I talked to urged a lumpectomy -- even though they did not know yet whether I had any lymph node involvement, or how aggressive it was, or whether it had spread. It had in fact grown rather fast and turned out to be an aggressive form.
I was also encouraged to have reconstructive surgery if I chose mastectomy. However, I chose mastectomy without reconstruction. I knew it had grown fast and I didn't want to go through it again.
The bias against mastectomy was quite strong, and except for once (the surgeon, thank goodness) I wasn't asked what I would prefer. I was told I "should" have a lumpectomy because "all women should keep their breasts if they can."
I am saddened to see now that women who truly, medically need a mastectomy are being allowed to choose a lumpectomy, but I believe that "caving" on the part of medical professionals stems from that anti-mastectomy bias that is really so prevalent in the medical community.
I'm not complaining about the care I received. It was outstanding. But the medical community needs to back away from this anti-mastectomy bias. It's almost as if they feel revulsion at the thought of mastectomy. I am here to tell them all that life goes on -- and pretty darned well, too!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





