Study Finds Computer Software As Effective As Second Radiologist
Main Category: IT / Internet / E-mailAlso Included In: Breast Cancer
Article Date: 06 Oct 2008 - 8:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Computer-aided detection software for mammograms is nearly as effective as a second radiologist reading the test results to determine the presence of breast tumors, according to a study published on Thursday in the New England Journal of Medicine, Reuters reports (Emery, Reuters, 10/1). For the study -- led by Fiona Gilbert, a radiologist at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland, and sponsored by the British government and Cancer Research UK -- researchers analyzed the results of a previous study involving more than 31,000 British women who underwent routine mammograms. The mammograms in most cases were reviewed once by two radiologists before they were reviewed again by one radiologist and the detection software (Nano, AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 10/2).
Double-reading increases the cancer detection rate and at least 12 European countries use two radiologists to evaluate mammograms. But standard practice in the U.S. is to have one radiologist review the results (Reuters, 10/1). According to the AP/Chronicle, computer-aided detection, or CAD, was developed to help detect more cancers but the added value of CAD continues to be debated. The study found that the detection rate of tumors by two radiologists was 88.7% and the recall rate for further examination was 3.4%, compared with a detection rate of 87.2% and a recall rate of 3.9% by one radiologist and the software (Reuters, 10/1). Researchers found that the software discovered 198 of 227 cancers, compared with 199 discovered by two radiologists.
Gilbert said that CAD could be used to expand screening in Britain and researchers wrote that in places like the U.S. where "single reading is standard practice," CAD has the "potential to improve cancer-detection rates to the level achieved by double reading" (AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 10/2). According to Reuters, researchers did not evaluate the accuracy rate of the new digital mammogram devices and did not consider the potential cost savings of using the software, Reuters reports (Reuters, 10/1).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our it / internet / e-mail section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/124228.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/124228.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




