Controversial Injections Examined At ASPS Annual Meeting

Main Category: Cosmetic Medicine / Plastic Surgery
Article Date: 11 Oct 2008 - 4:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


Injecting fat after breast reconstruction to correct implant wrinkling or dimpling may be safe and effective to improve breast shape, according to a study to be presented at the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Plastic Surgery 2008 conference, Oct. 31 - Nov. 5, in Chicago. Using fat injections for cosmetic breast enhancement; however, is still controversial and will be the subject of a panel discussion.

"My reconstruction patients could not be happier with the improvement fat transfer gives to the appearance of their breasts," said Gregory Scott, MD, ASPS Member Surgeon and study co-author. "The initial implant reconstruction sometimes leaves them with contour deformities or wrinkling, but fat injections can correct these problems and give their breasts a smoother, softer, more natural appearance."

The study looked at 21 patients who had 42 fat transfers for contour deformities or wrinkling. The injections were performed an average of 9.9 months following reconstruction. The fat was taken from the patients' abdomen or upper thighs. The study found that fat injection to the breast for reconstruction is safe, improves breast shape, and corrects implant wrinkling.

While fat injection in breast reconstruction is more accepted because there is no breast tissue left after mastectomy, cosmetic use of fat injections to the breast remains controversial. At Plastic Surgery 2008, a panel entitled, "Should We Inject Fat into the Breast," will discuss and analyze the medical and legal risks, patient safety implications, as well as potential benefits of cosmetic fat injections to the breast.

"At this point, there are no good scientific studies about cosmetic use of fat in the breast - this is an evolving issue without any scientific data," said William P. Adams, Jr., member of the ASPS Emerging Trends Committee and panel presenter. "We need to have good, sound, scientific studies to determine the usefulness and safety of this methodology before we offer it to our patients."

Two reasons noted for the controversy: one, fat can "calcify" in the breast and obscure mammograms or possibly be mistaken for fibrous cancer growths. Two, it is unknown how much fat is needed to adequately enlarge a breast, if and how much of the injected fat will be absorbed by the body, or how much time the procedure will take.

"Based on current reports these procedures are taking multiple hours in the operating room and yielding minimal enlargement, you really need to wonder how useful and safe that is for the patient," said Dr. Adams. "Nevertheless, this is all still unknown. For that reason, we need to wait until the issue has been studied in a controlled, scientific environment."

Another panel presented at Plastic Surgery 2008, "The Science of Fat Transfer - The Skinny on Fat," will examine fat transfer for a variety of purposes including breast surgery, wrinkle reduction, lip augmentation, and to restore damaged tissue resulting from injury or illness. How to harvest and process fat; the biology of fat-derived stem cells; pharmacologic factors that can increase fat's survival and lessen the absorption rate; and the use of fat transfer to treat tissue damaged by radiation therapy will be explored.

###

Nearly 348,000 breast augmentations were performed in 2007, making it the number one cosmetic plastic surgery procedure last year, according to ASPS statistics. There were more than 57,000 breast reconstruction procedures performed in 2007.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons is the largest organization of board-certified plastic surgeons in the world. Representing more than 6,700 physician members, the Society is recognized as a leading authority and information source on cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. ASPS comprises more than 90 percent of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the United States. Founded in 1931, the Society represents physicians certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery or The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

Source: ASPS Public Relations
American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our cosmetic medicine / plastic surgery section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
ASPS Public Relations. "Controversial Injections Examined At ASPS Annual Meeting." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 11 Oct. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/124912.php>

APA
ASPS Public Relations. (2008, October 11). "Controversial Injections Examined At ASPS Annual Meeting." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/124912.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Cosmetic Medicine / Plastic Surgery

How to Choose a Plastic Surgeon

The popularity of plastic surgery is soaring - and more and more doctors are trying to meet the demand for this specialty that has become an integral part of mainstream medicine. Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Cosmetic Medicine News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Cosmetic Medicine / Plastic Surgery Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »