Call For Choice Between Medicare Or Private Health Cover, Australia
Main Category: Public HealthAlso Included In: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 16 Oct 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Australians should be able to choose either private health cover or Medicare to ensure a more efficient and fair system and help reduce public waiting lists, a health care economist from The Australian National University has proposed.
Dr Francesco Paolucci - a Research Fellow at the Australian Centre for Economic Research on Health (ACERH) at ANU - says the current public/private mix in health care financing leads to duplication, high-transaction costs, and long waiting times in the public health sector.
"Although the policy goals of subsidising private health insurance in Australia are, among others, to decrease the pressure on the public system, increase choice and affordability of health coverage to Australians - the current arrangements have led to some perverse incentives and undesirable effects" Dr Paolucci said.
"Giving consumers a choice between Medicare and private health insurance (PHI), combined with a system of risk-adjusted subsidies, would improve incentives for efficiency and increase stability in the PHI market."
Dr Paolucci says Australia should explore introducing consumers' choice of health plan and leave Medicare and the private insurers to compete with each other to be a 'prudent buyer of care'.
"The crucial element of this approach is that it removes duplication of coverage by allowing individuals to choose to be enrolled in one plan or the other. Private health insurers would have to cover all types of services and pay all health care expenses, which is not the case now.
"An essential component of the 'Medicare/PHI choice' would be that as compensation for covering all health care costs, PHI holders or funds receive a risk-adjusted subsidy. In the long run, both PHI and Medicare might receive the same risk-adjusted subsidy from the Government who collects the funds, and manages the risk equalisation fund."
Prior to his appointment at ACERH, Dr Paolucci worked for five years as a researcher at the Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University of Rotterdam. In June this year he organised and presented in an ACERH Research Forum on Risk Equalisation in Health Insurance Markets, which included international and national experts from the academia, the Private Health Insurance Council and industry.
The argument about reforming health insurance is outlined in a new ACERH working paper, which is available from the ANU media office on request.
The Australian National University http://www.anu.edu.au
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/125638.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/125638.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





