Animal Testing - MEP Wants Law Changed, Duplicate Experiments Mean Too Many Animals Suffering, Europe
Main Category: VeterinaryAlso Included In: Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry; Biology / Biochemistry
Article Date: 30 Oct 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Plaid MEP Jill Evans (Wales) believes a twenty year old European law on animal testing is in urgent need of updating because it allows too many animals to suffer unnecessarily.
The MEP says many experiments are being duplicated, leading to animal suffering that could be avoided. The MEP wants the European Commission to establish a Europe-wide database, accessible to researchers, to help reduce the number of animals suffering in experiments.
Ms Evans was responsible for an influential report in the European Parliament in 2002 which detailed ways in which the European Directive on the protection of animals for experimental and other scientific purposes should be revised.
Six years on, the all-Wales MEP says the law is in urgent need of revision and she has written* to European Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas calling for the legislation to be reviewed without delay.
Jill Evans MEP said:
"Over twelve million animals are used in experiments across the EU every year, and the number is rising. We are not doing anywhere near enough to stop animals suffering unnecessarily, and an overhaul of existing laws is long overdue.
"The European Commission knows it's time for the law to be updated and has promised to do so. So why do are they continuing to delay any announcement?
"It's unbelievable that six years on from my earlier report so little progress has been made. That report highlighted the many areas where European legislation on animal testing is out of date. Duplication of experiments and scientific advances mean many tests on animals are simply unnecessary. That's why we must have a revision of this twenty year old law.
"I have written to European Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas urging him to act quickly to bring forward revised legislation. Too many animals are suffering without need and this must be stopped."
*Below is Jill Evans' letter to European Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas:
Commissioner Stavros Dimas
DG Environment
European Commission
200 Rue de La Loi
B1049 Brussels
Belgium
Dear Mr Dimas,
Proposed Revised Directive 86/60/EEC
I am writing to you to urge you to adopt as soon as possible for a revision of Directive 86/60/EEC.
I have worked on animal testing in the European Parliament for some time now. I am afraid that it has become apparent to me that there are several breaches of the afore-mentioned Directive which need to be rectified as soon as possible. I believe that there is a particularly urgent need to ensure that alternatives to the use of animals in experiments are not only developed, but used as standard. One of my main concerns is that so many experiments using animals are duplicated. I believe an EU-wide database should be established so that the results of any experiment are accessible to other researchers to stop more animals, in particular primates, suffering unnecessarily.
It is generally agreed that this Directive needs to be revised and modernised and myself and my colleagues have repeatedly called on the Commission to publish proposals to do so. This revision process started nearly six years ago, but the Commission keeps delaying adoption of its proposal. In September, the item was again removed from the official agenda despite public assurances. The Commission's own opinion polling demonstrates huge public concern on this issue.
A debate about the future of animal testing is long over-due. An important proposal such as this should not be further delayed. I look forward to your answer.
Yours sincerely
Jill Evans MEP
Plaid Cymru
Source
Jill Evans Press Office
http://www.jillevans.net
Visit our veterinary section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/127454.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/127454.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Species difference means poor correlation
posted by Harold on 17 Jul 2010 at 12:22 pmYes duplication is a problem, even more significant is the lack of scientific validity of animal experiments...According to the US FDA 92% of new drugs fail in clinical trials, after they have passed all the safety tests in animals. US FDA (2004) "Innovation or Stagnation, Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to new Medical Products"
"Given substances are not necessarily carcinogenic to all species. Studies show that 46% of chemicals found to be carcinogenic in rats were not carcinogenic in mice. [23] If species as closely related as mice to rats do not even contract cancer similarly, it's not surprising that 19 out of 20 compounds that are safe for humans caused cancer in animals. [24]
The US National Cancer Institute treated mice growing 48 different "human" cancers with a dozen different drugs proven successful in humans, and in 30 of the cases, the drugs were useless in mice. Almost two-thirds of the mouse models were wrong. Animal experimentation is not scientific because it is not predictive.
The US National Cancer Institute also undertook a 25 year screening programme, testing 40,000 plant species on animals for anti-tumour activity. Out of the outrageously expensive research, many positive results surfaced in animal models, but not a single benefit emerged for humans. As a result, the NCI now uses human cancer cells for cytotoxic screening.[25]
refs 23# DiCarlo DrugMet Rev,15; p409-131984.
24# Mutagenesis1987;2:73-78.
25# Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, Volume II Animal Models Svendensen and Hau (Eds.) CRC Press 1994 p4."
curedisease. net
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



