Opponents Of Michigan Embryonic Stem Cell Measure 'Confuse' Issue With Misleading Ads, Editorial Says

Main Category: Stem Cell Research
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 30 Oct 2008 - 9:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:4 stars

4 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


Opponents of Proposition 2 -- a Michigan ballot initiative that would amend the state constitution to allow embryonic stem cell research -- have "spent a great deal of money to confuse the issue" through misleading advertisements, a Detroit News editorial states. According to the editorial, "when voters are confused about what a ballot measure will do, they tend to vote no," which would be a "big mistake" with regards to Prop. 2. The proposed law is "not the extreme measure it is portrayed to be by the opposition," the editorial says.

"Contrary to what the anti-Prop. 2 ads say, the amendment doesn't allow wholly unrestricted and unregulated embryonic stem cell research," the editorial states. Rather, the amendment "would set very strict conditions" for embryo donation, including that the embryos were created for fertility treatments, were donated voluntarily by the individuals seeking the treatments and were set to be destroyed as medical waste if not donated for research. The editorial adds that the "best argument for supporting the proposal is that the embryos that will be used already exist and are destined to be discarded. That's a waste."

In addition, contrary to statements made by the opponents of the measure, taxpayer funding for the research would be granted only "if the taxpayers and their representatives choose to do so," according to the editorial. The amendment also "leaves in place all existing measures to prevent cloning," the editorial says.

Prop. 2 is a "sensible proposal that will allow Michigan to join other states in pursuing what could potentially be promising research, both in terms of medical breakthroughs and economic development," the editorial states, concluding that voters should "cut through the confusion" and vote in favor of the amendment (Detroit News, 10/28).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our stem cell research section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "Opponents Of Michigan Embryonic Stem Cell Measure 'Confuse' Issue With Misleading Ads, Editorial Says." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Oct. 2008. Web.
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/127490.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, October 30). "Opponents Of Michigan Embryonic Stem Cell Measure 'Confuse' Issue With Misleading Ads, Editorial Says." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/127490.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Stem Cell Research

What are Stem Cells?

Stem cells are a class of undifferentiated cells that are able to differentiate into specialized cell types. Commonly, stem cells come from two main sources: embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Stem Cell Research News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Stem Cell Research Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »