Disadvantage "Gets Under The Skin" And Alters Genes
Main Category: GeneticsAlso Included In: Respiratory / Asthma
Article Date: 10 Nov 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Poverty and social disadvantage "get under the skin" and alter genes-at least those involved in asthma-suggests a small study published ahead of print in the journal Thorax.
Social disadvantage has long been recognised as a major factor in greater vulnerability to sickness and death, and it is also associated with more severe asthma in childhood, the evidence shows.
The research team assessed the genetic profiles of a group of immune system cells (T lymphoctyes) in 31 children between the ages of 9 and 18, all of whom had been diagnosed with asthma.
T cells are involved in the airway inflammation that occurs in response to particular triggers, such as dust or animal hairs, and which typifies an asthma attack.
The parents also reported on their children's day and night-time symptoms and whether these symptoms had prompted the need for emergency care during the previous six months.
Half the children came from affluent privileged backgrounds, and half the children came from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Genes regulating inflammatory responses were much more active in children from disadvantaged backgrounds than in children from privileged backgrounds.
This included those genes involved in producing powerful inflammatory chemicals, called cytokines, which induce stress responses and wound healing.
Children from disadvantaged backgrounds also had more severe asthma symptoms.
Further analysis revealed differences between the two groups in signalling related to pathways that control immune cell activity and which are the targets of asthma drugs.
Children from privileged backgrounds had an excess of genes that help to contain inflammatory responses.
The design of the study means that definitive conclusions about cause and effect cannot be drawn, say the authors.
But they add: "...the findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the larger social environment can get 'under the skin' at the [genomic level]."
They also suggest that negative perceptions of the environment can alter biological mechanisms in the body, potentially explaining how disadvantaged backgrounds may get "under the skin."
"Genome wide transcriptional profiling linked to social class in asthma."
Thorax Online First 2008 doi 10.1136/thx.2007.095091
Click here to view the paper in full.
British Medical Journal
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London
WC1H 9JP
http://group.bmj.com/
Visit our genetics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/128750.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/128750.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Incomplete
posted by Anonymous on 14 Nov 2008 at 6:29 amIf the researchers did not test gene-environment backgrounds, then this research study is really not useful. Asthma has long been associated with socioeconomic status, likely (at least in part) because of environmental factors that affect disadvantaged children more than advantaged children (poor housing construction, excess environmental polluntants, etc.) There are also many other potentially confounding factors, like race/ethnicity, that may result in the differences in gene expression.
One other thing: scientists attempt to address socioeconomic status in the most unbiased way possible (i.e. using the terms "advantaged" and "disadvantaged"). NYT should not write "disadvantaged" vs. "affluent privileged." This clearly shows a bias against children who are not poor. Why the need for two loaded descriptors?? At the very least the journalist could have just chosen one (affluent or privileged). I learned in school that the media should be unbiased...apparently some journalists need to go back to school for this lesson.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




