Further Treatment 10 Times More Likely After Coronary Angioplasty Than After Bypass
Main Category: Cardiovascular / CardiologyAlso Included In: Heart Disease
Article Date: 10 Nov 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Heart patients who have coronary angioplasty are 10 times more likely to require further treatment as those who have a bypass graft, indicates research published ahead of print in the journal Heart.
Coronary angioplasty, known as percutaneous coronary intervention or PCI is a less invasive technique than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Both procedures are used to treat narrowed or blocked coronary arteries and restore normal blood flow to and from the heart (revascularisation).
The researchers base their findings on more than 6000 heart patients in one representative UK county (Leicestershire; population 946,000) between 1995/6 and 2003/4.
Some 2500 patients underwent CABG, while the remainder underwent PCI. They were monitored after their procedures to see how they fared.
Patients undergoing PCI tended to be younger than CABG patients, who tended to have higher rates of other illnesses, such as heart failure, diabetes, liver disease, and cancer.
The total number of procedures nearly doubled over the decade under study. And despite the increasing complexity of cases, the outcomes for patients undergoing both techniques improved considerably.
Around one in seven patients (just under 13%) died, with 16% of these deaths occurring within the first month after surgery and almost half within the first two years.
But deaths from all causes and from cardiovascular disease were less than 5% in the first two years, with both techniques.
After taking account of the older age and presence of other serious illness prior to treatment, survival rates were similar for both procedures.
But the need for repeat intervention was 10 times as high among those patients undergoing PCI as it was for those undergoing CABG.
"Improving long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary revascularisation: results from a large, population based cohort with first intervention 1995 - 2004."
Online First Heart 2008; doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.127928]
Click here to view the paper in full.
British Medical Journal
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London
WC1H 9JP
http://group.bmj.com/
Visit our cardiovascular / cardiology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/128751.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/128751.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





