American Association For Homecare Response To Sen. Baucus Healthcare Plan, USA
Main Category: Caregivers / HomecareArticle Date: 13 Nov 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The American Association for Homecare applauds U.S. Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont.) for proposing healthcare policies that "shift the focus from institutional care to services provided in the home and community" to improve quality of care and reduce costs. But the Association strongly disagrees with the idea, also put forward today in the Baucus healthcare plan, that competitive bidding is an anti-fraud program and is a sound payment methodology for home medical equipment and services.
"The underlying rationale for competitive bidding completely misrepresents the nature of home medical equipment and related services that are integral to homecare," said Tyler J. Wilson, president and CEO of the American Association for Homecare. "Competitive bidding would reduce quality of care and access to homecare for millions of seniors and people with disabilities."
Last month, the American Association for Homecare announced 13 specific recommendations that could eliminate most of the Medicare fraud attributed to the home medical equipment sector. The specific recommendations made by the Association include mandated site inspections for all new home medical equipment providers, unannounced site visits, a six-month trial period for new providers, proper federal funding for fraud prevention, post-payment audits, real-time claims analysis, more rigorous quality standards, and increased penalties, among other recommendations. The Association is sharing its anti-fraud recommendations with Medicare and its contractors, Congress, the Department of Justice, and the FBI. For details about the 13-point plan, visit the newsroom at http://www.aahomecare.org.
"The homecare sector has zero tolerance for fraudulent activity," Wilson said. "Those who perpetrate fraud are rarely legitimate home medical equipment providers. The federal agency that oversees Medicare has done a poor job of keeping cheats, fraudsters, and other bad actors from masquerading as home medical providers."
The Association has been working with Congress and regulators over the past year to adopt tougher, more effective measures to combat Medicare fraud. Earlier this year, the American Association for Homecare recommended to Congress several anti-fraud measures that were incorporated into the Seniors and Taxpayers Obligation Protection (STOP) Act of 2008, S. 3164, a bill to reduce Medicare fraud, which was introduced on June 19, 2008.
On July 15, Congress enhanced fraud prevention by strengthening a statutory mandate for the accreditation of home medical equipment providers and closing a loophole that would have allowed non-accredited providers to provide services to Medicare beneficiaries. The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) mandates a September 30, 2009 deadline for accreditation of all home medical equipment providers nationwide.
The Association is on record as noting that the competitive bidding program for home medical equipment, which was reformed and delayed by MIPPA, is a price-setting mechanism - not an anti-fraud measure. The Association believes that the federal government should not arbitrarily limit the number of homecare providers who furnish care to seniors and people with disabilities. The number of providers should be determined by the marketplace.
Approximately eight million Americans require some type of medical care in their home, which reduces the length of hospital stays and keeps many Americans out of hospitals and nursing homes.
The American Association for Homecare represents durable medical equipment providers, manufacturers, and other organizations in the homecare community. Members serve the medical needs of millions of Americans who require oxygen equipment and therapy, mobility assistive technologies, medical supplies, inhalation drug therapy, home infusion, and other medical equipment and services in their homes. The Association's members operate more than 3,000 homecare locations in all 50 states.
American Association for Homecare
Visit our caregivers / homecare section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
3 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/129190.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/129190.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Call To Action/Halth Care Reform 2009 Proposal
posted by H. Green MD on 14 Nov 2008 at 4:53 pmThe Call to Action/Health Care Reform 2009 proposal released 11/13/08
(http://www.finance.senate.gov/) by Senator Max Baucus is a disaster.
The Baucus plan is an expansion and continuation of the status-quo
mixture of a government subsidized ineffective private health
maintenance insurance industry operating parallel to and within Medicare
Insurance.
7 Specific Reasons Why the Baucus Health Reform 2009 Plan Fails.....
1) The Baucus plan fails to enroll all Americans in a single payer
National Health Insurance such as the most efficient health insurance
plan (Medicare) which is already contracted with most doctors,
hospitals and clinics in the Country. Medicare has the lowest operating
expenses and the best morbidity (sickness rates) and mortality (death
rates) compared to all other insurance companies. The Baucus plan will
therefore divert $700 Billion to $1 Trillion per year away from
patients, hospitals, doctors, clinics, nurses, pharmaceuticals,
therapist and researchers into the overhead pockets of health private
insurance company administrators and executives.
2) The Baucus plan fails to technologically upgrade, integrate and
centralize medical billing and records systems in order to optimize
examination of clinical outcomes, pharmaceutical efficacies and monitor
fraud and abuse. In addition, by failing to centralize and
technologically upgrade billing and records systems within a single
National Health Insurance plan, America will be unable to instantly
monitor disease outbreaks and instantly respond to natural and man made
disasters or bio-nuclear terrorism..
3) The Baucus plan fails to control drug costs by failing to allow a
single efficient national health insurance company such as Medicare to
bid on pharmaceuticals. In addition, the Baucus plan by failing to put
all Americans on a National Health Insurance Plan such as Medicare does
little to shrink the 'risk pool' of insured, thereby failing to decrease
insurance premium expenses for all Americans.
4) The Baucus plan fails to provide funding for scientific, clinical and
epidemiological research and development by allowing private private
insurance companies to divert funds from medical research and
development to instead support their massive and profitable
administrative and executive bureaucratic overheads.
5) The Baucus plan fails to provide physicians with the same legal
protection from malpractice lawsuits which have been established for
commercial health insurance corporations during the last 3 decades.
6) The Baucus plan fails to explain where to find the 1.5 million new
health care workers which will be needed once 100 million new Americans
obtain health care insurance. Health care workers can be found easily by
shutting down the wasteful and inefficient private health insurance
companies, putting all Americans on National Health Insurance such as
Medicare. The 1.5 million former private insurance company bureaucrats
can then be remployed to actually deliver health care in hospitals,
clinics, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, pharmacies and home
health services such as Alzheimer family assistance.
7) The Baucus Plan fails to address this problem of disenfranchised
physicians. Many physicians in this country have left the practice of
medicine, or downsized their practices due to private insurance company
abuses, malpractice threats and direct pharmaceutical marketing. A
recent national poll of physicians based on the AMA database
demonstrated that 60% of physicians support a single payer National
Health Insurance such as Medicare. A continuation and technological
upgrading of our most fair Medicare Health Insurance for all based on
the concepts outlined above, would undoubtedly motivate those
disenfranchised physicians to return to the profession and bright
younger physicians to invigorate the field.
The Baucus plan is wasteful, inefficient, fragmented, creates a new
redundant beurocracy and will continue to provide no potential future
health improvements for America. Only an efficient National Health
Insurance carrier such as a technologically upgraded Medicare Insurance
company will be able to provide low cost health insurance and pharmaceuticals
for all Americans while maintaining the quality of private physician practices and Hospitals.
H. Green, MD, FACP, FAAD, FACMS
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



