Absence Of Medicaid Coverage Impacts Neonatal Male Circumcision Rates
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Men's health; Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 17 Nov 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
1 (6 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1.5 (6 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Lack of Medicaid coverage for neonatal male circumcision correlated with lower rates of circumcision, a new study found. In light of recent clinical trials in Africa that suggest uncircumcised males may face greater risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, lack of Medicaid coverage for circumcision may translate into future health disparities for children born to poor families covered by Medicaid.
Data were pulled from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, with a sample size of 417,282 male newborns. The average neonatal circumcision rate across the 683 hospitals in the sample was 55.9 percent. Circumcision rates were 24% higher in states whose Medicaid programs cover the procedure than in those that do not. The study's authors emphasize, however, "The African results relate to transmission from female sexual partners to uninfected men. However, in the United States, only 16 percent of all AIDS cases among men are linked to heterosexual transmission, whereas 18 percent are linked exclusively to drug use, and 65 percent are linked to male-to-male sexual contact."
"Male Circumcision in the United States: Determinants and Policy implications."
Arleen Leibowitz et al.
American Journal of Public Health
The American Journal of Public Health is the monthly Journal of the American Public Health Association (APHA), the oldest and most diverse organization of public health professionals in the world. APHA is a leading publisher of books and periodicals promoting sound scientific standards, action programs and public policy to enhance health. More information is available at www.apha.org.
American Public Health Association
www.apha.org
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/129593.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/129593.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Biased studies
posted by Charles Winter on 17 Nov 2008 at 6:39 pmThere is no concrete evidence to show any medical benefit at all to circumcision.
All of the studies and the one promoting circumcision in Africa, ostensibly to prevent HIV are by Jewish doctors, who are to say the least, biased.
Circumcision did nothing to prevent the spread of HIV in the United States, as at the height of the epidemic 80% of the men in the US were already victims of male genital mutilation, called circumcision. ALL other countries in Europe, Asia, South America, where they don't habitually mutilate helpless infant males, had lower transmission rates.
Biased doctors trying to promote a rite of their own religion are creating a cultural incursion, an invasion of Africa. Now even the government of Israel has become involved.
It's unethical to try to spread a mutilating religious rite among other peoples who do not adhere to that religion, to say the least.
This will actually accelerate the spread of HIV, as those individuals who have been circumcised and their partners will think that they're immune to the disease.
They recommend circumcision AND the use of a condom. Why should they get circumcised in the first place, if they use a condom? There are other agendas at work here.
Those Not Circumcised Mey Get The Health Benefit
posted by Jack on 18 Nov 2008 at 1:12 pmThe article has the bit:
"lack of Medicaid coverage for circumcision may translate into future health disparities for children born to poor families covered by Medicaid."
However, it may be that avoiding this neonatal surgery will result in health benefits. Avoiding the surgery will avoid getting MRSA (a risk), as well as the many of the short term/ and known complications of circumcision. For the long term, avoiding circumcision may avoid ED and PE health risks as well as providing full natural sensation for male for sex.
This part of the body gives the man that has it great pleasure. It is best to leave the baby as he is naturally.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





