The Quality And Outcomes Framework Is One Government Target That Truly Benefits Patients, Says British Medical Association
Main Category: Primary Care / General PracticeAlso Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 19 Nov 2008 - 4:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is one government target that has brought real benefit to patients across the UK, the BMA said today (Wednesday 19 November 2008). Responding to a report from Civitas, which claims the QOF offers inappropriate financial incentives, Dr Laurence Buckman, Chairman of the BMA's GP Committee, said:
"It is very disappointing that this document is short on evidence and long on opinion about one aspect of the GP contract that has brought real benefit to patients. A lot of government health targets have distorted clinical care - the 48 hour access target, for example, doesn't allow doctors to prioritise their patients on the basis of need. Yet the QOF is different. It was never intended as just an incentive payment; its introduction marked a huge step forward in the government's promise to address health inequalities across the UK. Unlike other government targets, it was developed in close partnership with the profession, together with experts and the involvement of patient groups.
"Through the QOF, a process is now in place which means patients in the very early stages of the diseases which kill the majority of people in this country are actively sought out and their conditions are managed systematically. Over the long-term, the QOF will save many lives and it means patients can be confident that they will get the same consistent, evidence-based care wherever they live in the UK."
Responding to claims within the report that GPs have been 'gaming', Dr Buckman added:
"There is no published evidence that GPs are 'gaming' and the statistics on exception reporting, which this refers to, show it is the lowest it has ever been. The assertions in this report are based on anecdotes that are without evidence."
Although patients' health was improving before QOF, the rate and consistency has gathered pace since its introduction. The intervention standards - linked to workload and likely benefit - which the report claims are too modest, have been recommended by a large, independent group of experts and are based on published evidence.
Note
For more information on the QOF and the improvements in the health outcomes for patients since the changes to the GP contract, including a case study on how the QOF works in a practice, please go here.
British Medical Association
Visit our primary care / general practice section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/130000.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/130000.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



