Media Examine Opposition To Proposed HHS Conscience Rule

Main Category: Abortion
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology;  Sexual Health / STDs;  Primary Care / General Practice
Article Date: 04 Dec 2008 - 2:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:3 stars

3 (2 votes)

Article Opinions: 1 posts

The Florida Times-Union on Wednesday examined reactions in Florida to the proposed HHS conscience rule, which would permit health care providers who receive federal grants to opt out of medical care based on their moral or religious beliefs.

Alissa Swota -- an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of North Florida and a medical ethicist at Wolfson Children's Hospital -- said that balancing the medical needs of patients with the moral concerns of health care providers is important but that "trying to find the middle ground" is "where the difficulty is." She added that the proposal seems to give the "weight of authority" to providers, which raises concerns that patients could be turned away by pharmacists or physicians. Swota said, "When you're talking about Jacksonville, Fla., with a Walgreens on every corner, that's not an undue burden. But if you're talking rural South Dakota, then it might be you have no other option,"

Staci Fox, chief executive of Planned Parenthood of Northeast Florida, said the proposed rule could allow health care providers to deny procedures and prescriptions that patients deem appropriate. Fox added that the rule also would allow health care providers to refuse to provide information about the medicines or treatments to which they object. Fox said, "This would prohibit women from getting comprehensive information and services because providers can make the decisions based on their moral beliefs" (Brumley, Florida Times-Union, 12/3).

Broadcast Coverage

MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show" on Tuesday included a discussion with Melissa Harris-Lacewell -- an associate professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University -- about the proposed rule. Harris-Lacewell said the rule represents a new strategy for limiting women's reproductive rights. She added, "Rather than fight this out in the courts, rather than remove the constitutional right that currently exists for women to protect their health around reproduction, instead you limit access and you limit the education that doctors are getting in medical schools" (Maddow, "The Rachel Maddow Show," MSNBC, 12/2).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "Media Examine Opposition To Proposed HHS Conscience Rule." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 4 Dec. 2008. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/131746.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, December 4). "Media Examine Opposition To Proposed HHS Conscience Rule." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/131746.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Abortion

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Abortion News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Abortion Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »