Wrong To Blame Republican Loss On Pro-Life Movement, Opinion Piece Says
Main Category: AbortionArticle Date: 09 Dec 2008 - 4:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Ross Douthat, senior editor of the Atlantic and co-author of the book "Grand New Party: How Republicans Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream," argues in a New York Times opinion piece that blaming the pro-life movement for the Republican Party's 2008 defeat is an unjustified, but familiar and frustrating, refrain.
According to Douthat, the "message" from many conservative leaders is "clear": that the Republican Party "would be back on its feet in no time" if it would "only jettison its position on abortion." Douthat adds that many abortion-rights opponents have taken advice that the antiabortion movement should focus on "helping human beings outside the womb as well as those within it" to "heart" and that the "culture of...protest that once defined the movement is largely a thing of the past."
Although abortion-rights opponents have shown that they can "change, adapt and compromise," the "question" is whether the antiabortion movement "can afford to compromise" on the "composition of the courts," Douthat writes. According to Douthat, there are "many middle grounds imaginable in America's abortion wars, from bans that make exceptions for rape and fetal deformities to legal systems modeled on the French system, in which abortion is available but discouraged in the first 10 weeks and sharply restricted thereafter" and the American public is "amenable to compromise." However, the antiabortion movement remains "essentially trapped" by the "inflexibility" of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which, according to Douthat, prohibit serious legal restrictions on abortion.
Douthat adds that "as long as the Supreme Court remains closely divided," the antiabortion movement's "basic political task will remain the same. Not because pro-lifers are absolutists who reject compromise, but because any real compromise will always depend on overturning Roe." Douthat concludes, "Giving up on this goal would mean giving up on the movement's very purpose, while gaining nothing in return" (Douthat, New York Times, 12/7).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132239.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132239.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




