Tobacco Display Ban - Health Wins The Day! UK
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingArticle Date: 10 Dec 2008 - 1:00 PDT
ASH welcomes the government's announcement that tobacco products are to be removed from public view as part of a range of measures to protect children from tobacco marketing. Although it is disappointing that tobacco sales will still be permitted from vending machines, overall tobacco marketing will be virtually eliminated by the display ban, protecting children and smokers trying to quit. This measure will put England amongst a small group of countries that have already passed such legislation. [2] Evidence from other jurisdictions with such legislation already in place suggests that this will reduce the numbers of young people taking up smoking, costs to businesses can be minimal, and that no shops have been forced to close as a result. [1]
ASH Director, Deborah Arnott said:
"The Government is to be congratulated on getting rid of these deadly displays, temptingly placed to attract children right by the sweet counter in corner shops, newsagents, supermarkets and petrol stations throughout the land. Claims that businesses will fail because of this measure are unfounded. In other countries which have brought in such measures they have been both popular and effective, without putting shops out of business."
ASH is also pleased that the government is taking seriously the proposal to require plain packaging of tobacco products and urges it to go farther and faster. Prohibiting retail display is only half the battle, to complete the job tobacco packaging must be standardised so all attractive and promotional aspects are removed, save for the brand name. The tobacco industry itself admits that the cigarette pack is "the communication life-blood of the firm…. the silent salesman", an essential weapon in the struggle to recruit smokers now traditional advertising, promotion and sponsorship is banned. [3]
On vending machines ASH urges the government to go further and announce a complete ban, not just to further restrict access. The current guidelines are already supposed to ensure that tobacco vending machines are located only in places not routinely accessed by children such as pubs and clubs. However these have clearly failed since 14% of smokers under the age of 16 report that they usually purchase cigarettes from vending machines. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the modification of vending machines to 'child-proof' them is effective in stopping illegal sales. [4]
"Further restricting access to vending machines as opposed to banning sales of tobacco products altogether is a half-baked measure. It will do little or nothing to reduce under-age smoking, whilst incurring additional costs to vending machine manufacturers."
Note and links
[1] For more information on prohibition of retail display see ASH briefing here.
[2] The following jurisdictions have passed legislation to ban tobacco displays at the point of sale: Two countries (Iceland, Thailand), 12 Canadian provinces and territories, the Australian state of Tasmania, and the British Virgin Islands have adopted laws to prohibit the visible display of tobacco products at point of purchase.
Countries (3)
1. Iceland (August 1, 2001)
2. Thailand (September 24, 2005)
3. Ireland (July 2009)
Canada (12 of 13 provinces/territories)
1. Saskatchewan (March 11, 2002)*
2. Manitoba (January 1, 2004)*
3. Nunavut (February 1, 2004)
4. Prince Edward Island (June 1, 2006)
5. Northwest Territories (Jan. 21, 2007)*
6. Nova Scotia (March 31, 2007)
7. British Columbia (March 31, 2008)**
8. Ontario (May 31, 2008)
9. Quebec (May 31, 2008)
10. Alberta (July 1, 2008)
11. New Brunswick (Jan. 1, 2009)
12. Yukon Territory (May 15, 2009)
13. Ireland (1 July 2009)
Australian states
1. Tasmania (Feb. 1, 2011)
Other
1. British Virgin Islands (May 31, 2007) (British territory, Caribbean)
[3] For more information on plain packaging see ASH briefing here.
[4] For more information on vending machines see the ASH briefing here.
ASH
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132419.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132419.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (4)
More ASH Propaganda
posted by Dave Atherton on 10 Dec 2008 at 7:26 amASH maybe on a self congratulatory orgy of smugness, however the losers are the truth and corner shops, many family owned. Firstly, in 2003 ASH said the smoking ban in pubs was going to be good for business, 2,500 closed bars later and 40,000 unemployed I think their crystal ball is cloudy. They quote Iceland and the Canadian state of Saskatchewan as examples where tobacco display bans have worked. Absolutely untrue. In 1999 the number of 15-19 year olds who smoke was 20.7%. The display ban came in 2001. In 2007 the figure, I kid you not is 20.7%. The Icelandic government thoughtfully publish their statistics in English, please peruse the site yourself.
Saskatewan has the highest teenage smoking at 25% against a national average of 19%. You will no doubt note I got this from the Saskatchewan Lung Association, hardly in the pay of tobacco companies.
How can you have a debate on smoking when it is not discussed on facts?
More ASH Propaganda
posted by chas on 11 Dec 2008 at 2:21 amHaving read this article of Dave Atherton, I wonder how people can believe what ASH say when it can easily be disproved.
Iceland Youth Smoking Figures
posted by Bill Clelland on 11 Dec 2008 at 3:49 amFrom the Independent:
Dave Atherton states that Iceland has not seen a drop in the number of young people smoking cigarettes since introducing its ban in 2001.
This is not correct. The results of one survey, with a small sample size and high margins of error are promoted by tobacco retailers as the figures suit their purpose. This looks to be where Dave gets his figures.
However, Iceland participates in ESPAD, the European Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs. This conducts a 4 yearly survey of year 10 students in schools in Iceland and achieves 80-90% response which makes the margin of error negligible.
The survey found that 18.6% of year 10 students smoked daily in 1999, prior to the 2001 ban. This fell to 13.6% in 2003 and then to 11.1% in 2007.
The figures are readily available through the Icelandic ESPAD website.
A For Effort D For Attainment
posted by Dave Atherton on 12 Dec 2008 at 3:12 amMr Bond we meet again. As someone who has been on the ESPAD site, it has a number of flaws compared to Iceland's own statistical database (http://www.satice.is). Firstly, ESPAD only does it statistics every 4 years, the latest for 2007 seems to be missing. Also for smoking it covers only one age group, Year 10, which I guess are 15 year olds. The Iceland database is collated annually and covers ages from 15 to 19.
By inference the samples are higher. I see ESPAD requires a log in and Statice does not. Table 1 are the figures for people who have never smoked and as you can see the figures are literally static from 2000 to 2007. Table 2 are the figures for regular smokers, and in 7 years they have slightly risen.
I look upon the right not to smoke as equally as your right to smoke and take no pleasure/displeasure in stats going up or down. I just want an honest debate based on the truth.
Table 1 Never smoked Table 2 Regular smoking
2000 69.3% 2000 14.4%
2001 70.0% 2001 17.5%
2002 70.6% 2002 17.9%
2003 65.8% 2003 16.9%
2004 72.6% 2004 17.4%
2005 69.7% 2005 15.7%
2006 67.7% 2006 12.2%
2007 69.3% 2007 15.2%
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






