Supreme Court Might Review Whistle-Blower Case That Could Set Limits On Lawsuits Against Drugmakers, Biotech Firms
Main Category: Litigation / Medical MalpracticeAlso Included In: Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry
Article Date: 10 Dec 2008 - 4:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering reviewing a case that could set new limits on whistle-blower lawsuits against drugmakers, biotechnology companies and other businesses, Bloomberg reports. The court has asked the Department of Justice for advice on the suit, which alleges that a North Carolina water district fraudulently sought federal money for storm cleanup. The case is based on the U.S. False Claims Act, which allows whistle-blowers to file fraud claims on behalf of the federal government and share in any damages.
Bloomberg reports that the "central question is whether a False Claims Act suit can go forward even though the central allegations have previously been made public in state documents." The act bars lawsuits only when allegations have been made public by the federal government, not by state governments. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed with that provision, but lower courts have disagreed.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and the Biotechnology Industry Organization have said that the circuit court decision might cause lawsuits to "skyrocket." According to a brief filed by the two groups, health care fraud cases filed under the law resulted in $1.1 billion in settlements and judgments in 2007 (Stohr, Bloomberg, 12/8).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
© 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132440.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132440.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



