NYT Letters To The Editor Respond To Opinion Piece On GOP Election Defeats, Antiabortion Movement
Main Category: AbortionArticle Date: 11 Dec 2008 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
The New York Times on Wednesday published letters to the editor in response to a Dec.7 opinion piece by Ross Douthat that examined whether the antiabortion movement can be blamed for the Republican Party's losses in the 2008 presidential election. Summaries of two of the letters appear below.
~ Jennifer Blei Stockman: Leaders of the abortion-rights movement "need to understand that pro-choice Republicans are not absolutists," Blei Stockman, co-chair of the Republican Majority for Choice, writes in a letter to the editor. According to Blei Stockman, 78% of Republicans polled in August said abortion issues should be decided by a woman, not the government, and an "overwhelming 66% of self-described 'pro-life' voters believe abortion should be decided by a woman." She adds that the Republican Party's "approach on the issue of personal choice should fall in line with its core tenet of smaller government -- less intrusion in our pocketbooks and our personal lives." Blei Stockman continues that Douthat's "attack on the pro-choice movement is a ruse, and his encouragement of opportunistic extreme policies will hurt the GOP further." She concludes, "If the GOP is to succeed in rebuilding its broken party, it needs to move past a failed plan for party realignment toward the extreme and revive its broad appeal to its true moderate majority" (Blei Stockman, New York Times, 12/10).
~ Paula Hillard: Douthat is "out of touch with this country when he characterizes abortion bans and mandatory parental involvement as 'compromise,'" Paula Hillard, a gynecologist and board member of Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health, writes in a letter to the editor. Hillard writes that she is "grateful" to voters who defeated the proposed abortion ban on the South Dakota ballot and the California parental notification initiative "for keeping my patients' decisions about their health private." She concludes that "[o]verturning Roe v. Wade would not be a compromise, but a repudiation of what Americans believe about abortion" (Hillard, New York Times, 12/10).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132605.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/132605.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




