Post-Election Surveying Shows S.D. Voters Support Preventing Unintended Pregnancies Over Abortion Bans
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyAlso Included In: Sexual Health / STDs; Abortion; Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Article Date: 12 Jan 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Analysis of post-election surveys by the South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families shows that South Dakota residents want a shift in state politics away from trying to implement abortion bans toward efforts to prevent unintended pregnancies, Jan Nicolay, co-chair of the organization, said this week, the Sioux Falls Argus Leader reports (Brandert, Sioux Falls Argus Leader, 1/8). South Dakota voters in November 2008 rejected Initiated Measure 11, which would have banned abortions except in narrowly defined cases of rape or incest or to preserve the health or life of the woman. Voters defeated the measure by 55% to 45% (Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 12/8/08).
South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families plans to send copies of its findings to state lawmakers. Group officials said that the report is a chance to educate newly elected lawmakers, who make up about half of the state House. Nicolay said the findings show that South Dakota residents "do not want government intruding into their personal medical decisions." She added, "We just think everyone should work together on [preventing unintended pregnancies] and not spend time with ballot issues." Casey Murschel, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice South Dakota, said, "Constituents do not want their legislators spending this time in Pierre working on abortion bans."
Leslee Unruh -- founder of the Alpha Center and Abstinence Clearinghouse and leader of the campaign supporting last year's ballot initiative -- said opponents of such a ban are "afraid there is going to be a challenge in front of the Legislature." According to Unruh, 18 state legislatures are considering abortion-related legislation, including informed consent measures similar to a 2005 South Dakota law (HB 1166) that requires physicians to tell women seeking abortions that a fetus is a separate, whole, unique human being. Unruh added that she has no plans to contact lawmakers about proposing another abortion ban measure (Sioux Falls Argus Leader, 1/8).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/134998.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/134998.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




