Defining Increased Future Risk For Prostate Cancer: Evidence From A Population Based Screening Cohort
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 12 Jan 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
UroToday.com - For men with a relatively low PSA on prostate cancer (CaP) screening, what is their risk on future screening exams of having CaP detected? This question was addressed by Dr. Fritz Schröder and collaborators in the online edition of the Journal of Urology.
Their work used the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) database. Beginning in 1993, men ages 55 to 74 years old underwent screening by PSA, DRE and TRUS. Initially a PSA of >4.0ng/ml prompted a biopsy, but in 1997 this was decreased to >3.0ng/ml. Also, an abnormal DRE or TRUS resulted in the recommendation for a prostate biopsy. Men who did not meet the criteria for a prostate biopsy on the first round of screening, and also had a second screening, comprised the database for this study. To establish the 4-year risk of CaP diagnosis, the number of men in whom CaP was detected at the second screening was divided by the total number of men who completed round 2 of screening. The investigators evaluated 2 populations; population 1 consisted of all men regardless of previous biopsy status (5,176 men) and population 2 excluded the influence of a previous biopsy on the characteristics of PSA as a predictor of CaP, and thus excluded all men who had undergone a biopsy at the first round of screening (3,501 men).
At the first screening, the mean PSA was 2.4ng/ml, and 31.5% met the criteria for prostate biopsy. In population 1, 299 prostate cancer cases were detected among 1,748 biopsies in 5,176 men, reflecting a 5.8% 4-year risk. In population 2, 178 cases of CaP were detected from 760 biopsies in 3,501 men for a 5.1% 4-year risk. This was associated with a mean population PSA of 1.5ng/ml at the first screening. Most cases in the first and second round screening had a Gleason score <7. Men with a PSA value of 1.5ng/ml or greater at round 1 were at significantly greater risk of having a positive biopsy at round 2 compared with men whose initial PSA was <1.5ng/ml.
The authors reported an absolute risk of having a positive biopsy of 3.74/1,000 patient-years for men whose initial PSA was <1.5ng/ml compared to 22.12/1,000 patient-years for men whose initial PSA was >1.5ng/ml. Furthermore, a previous negative biopsy was also associated with a significant reduction in risk for CaP.
Schröder FH, Roobol MJ, Andriole GL, Fleshner N
J Urol. 2008 Nov 12. Epub ahead of print
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.012
Written by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/135038.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/135038.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




