Advocates Press Obama To Shift Global Policies Away From Bush's Religion-Based Approach
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyAlso Included In: Sexual Health / STDs; Public Health; Abortion
Article Date: 22 Jan 2009 - 0:00 PDT
Socially progressive advocacy groups are calling for President Obama's administration to change the nation's approach to global reproductive health and women's rights efforts, including through the restoration of family-planning funding for the United Nations Population Fund, the Washington Post reports. According to the Post, the efforts are part of a push to "transform the way the United States deals with matters of sex, marriage and religious values in the international arena." Congress plans to submit legislation to Obama by March that would restore tens of millions of dollars to UNFPA for family-planning programs for the first time in seven years. In addition, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) have pressured the Obama administration to support U.N. conventions to expand rights for women and children. Susan Rice, Obama's nominee for U.N. ambassador, during her Senate confirmation hearing last week said that she also supports the 1979 U.N. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In addition, Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton has said she plans to increase U.S. support for women's rights "in every country, every region on every continent."
The Post reports that Obama's first week in office will coincide with the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, which past presidents have used as an occasion to impose or remove restrictions on funding for groups that provide abortions in other countries. Adrienne Germain, president of the International Women's Health Coalition, said that she hopes the Obama administration will renew leadership on a platform established during the 1994 U.N. Cairo Conference on Population and Development, which emphasized the legitimacy of different types of families and established a basis for women's reproductive health rights, and work toward the goal of universal access to reproductive health services in the next five years. Germain said that during the Bush administration, the "American people have been stifled by the loud and well-organized views of a minority, legitimized by the White House. This is a restoration of the majority view, which is that most people want to see the separation of church and state." Joseph Amon, head of the HIV/AIDS and Human Rights Program at Human Rights Watch, said that although Bush had supported significant investment in global efforts against HIV/AIDS, the efforts relied too heavily on abstinence-based programs. Amon said, "If we want to have an impact on the AIDS epidemic, we cannot allow moral ideological consideration to trump scientific evidence and human rights." Alan Leshner, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said that he expects that "there is going to be a reversal in the way in which we approach science-based issues" under the Obama administration, adding that "[s]cience will replace ideology and political expediency as the basis from which you start."
The Post reports that social conservatives -- who under the Bush administration "enjoyed direct access to the White House and to American negotiators in U.N. debates" -- now are "bracing for a long period in the political wilderness." Conservatives plan to refocus attention toward alliances with other conservatives, such as the Vatican, traditionally Catholic countries and Islamic nations. Patrick Fagan, director of the Center for Family and Religion at the Family Research Council, said he predicts a "tectonic shift" in global social policies under Obama's administration (Lynch, Washington Post, 1/18).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/136214.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/136214.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Religious-based Approach To Abortion
posted by SANDI on 23 Jan 2009 at 1:58 pmWhy is abstinence considered 'religious-based?' Yes, religions do promote this view but there are very many practical and behavioral scientific reasons for abstinence.
Africa has made great gains by encouraging abstinence outside a relationship where a child can be safely raised, and to prevent HIV as well as limit other diseases and death. It is a good thing! There is less teen pregnancy and fewer children born without fathers. Those great gains should be applauded not mocked.
Abstinence for American high school girls prevents sexual relationships before a girl is ready, while she is being educated so she can concentrate on her development and health, without the heavy choice of abortions. Her self-esteem will be better when she postpones the issues of sexual activity. In turn she has a greater chance of becoming the mature free woman she wants to be.
Why all this negative fearful speech about something that is good, teaches self-discipline and just might benefit all of society is taught with wisdom and experience. Give her the choice to abstain!
Deferring sexual activity never hurt anyone, nor did faithfulness in marriage.
Presenting these standards as abnormal is careless and shows an inability to seriously look at the experience of the USA public schools in the last l5 years. These beautiful historically proven options teach how to build a responsible community and make it secure and safe. Do you prefer the instant gratification, indulgent behaviors we have encouraged and modeled while we produce a "Nation of Wimps?"
Sandi
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



