Warning: We Are Running Out Of Options To Fight Ever-Changing 'Super Bugs'
Main Category: MRSA / Drug ResistanceAlso Included In: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses; Genetics; Biology / Biochemistry
Article Date: 29 Jan 2009 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
People are dying from "super bugs" because our antibiotic arsenal has run dry, leaving the world without sufficient weapons to fight ever-changing bacteria, warn infectious disease researchers at The University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
In a Jan. 29 perspective in The New England Journal of Medicine, Barbara E. Murray, M.D., and Cesar Arias, M.D., Ph.D., evaluate the past, present and future response to preventing and treating "super bugs."
A "super bug" is an organism that is resistant to antibiotics. It can evade antibiotics by:
- destroying the medication by producing an enzyme that devours the drug;
- creating a barrier to the drug;
- pumping out any antibiotic that reaches the bacterial cell;
- modifying the target of the antibiotic so the drug can't bind to it.
According to a 2004 report, "Bad Bugs, No Drugs," by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), none of the 89 new drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were antibiotics. Murray and Arias say people are also taking antibiotics without prescriptions or not following the prescription as directed. It is those practices that allow the antibiotics to be exposed to a wide-range of bacteria in the body, both good and bad, which gives the bugs an opportunity to find ways to beat antibiotic weapons.
"We have run out of options. The promise of genomics has not panned out. Gene sequencing has not helped us find a better way to fight these bugs," said Murray, holder of the J. Ralph Meadows Professorship in Internal Medicine at the medical school. Genomics is the study of an organism's genomes to chart its DNA sequencing.
According to the IDSA's 2004 report, the research on new antibiotics is simply drying up, in part due to the expense of bringing a new drug to market. "The pharmaceutical companies, like all other publicly traded industries, must deliver to its shareholders in order to justify their continued investment. The unique nature of antibiotics makes securing investments challenging. Because antibiotics work so well and so fast, they produce a weak return on investment for manufacturers. Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for seven to 14 days," the report said.
Delay in diagnosis is also an issue. Murray said even with advancements, it takes about 48 hours or more from the time a culture is taken to determine what a person may have contracted and to determine what antibiotics are likely to be effective. "It may not sound like a lot of time, but with some of these bugs you have to move quickly to save a patient. You don't want the bacteria to spread. Research needs to include finding new testing methods," Murray said.
The Division of Infectious Diseases at the UT Medical School is already working toward solutions. It has now established the Laboratory for Antimicrobial Research, headed by Arias, within the Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, headed by Murray. The laboratory, which is supported with funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aims to investigate the clinical and molecular aspects of antibiotic resistance, attempting to understand the complex mechanisms by which bugs become resistant to antibiotics and then designing new strategies to combat them.
"We are struggling, really struggling to treat patients around the world. If something isn't done soon, more and more bugs are going to gain the upper-hand. There are simply not enough new drugs to keep pace with antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections," Murray said. "We are sounding the alarm, and hopefully the world will hear it."
###
Barbara E. Murray, M.D., is a nationally and internationally recognized expert in infectious diseases, microbiology and bacterial pathogenesis who has served on the FDA's Anti-Infectives Advisory Committee. She conducts NIH-funded research and has also served on a number of other NIH committees and study sections. She is also past chairs of the NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee and the Program Planning Committee of the American Society of Microbiology's ICAAC meeting, the world's largest infectious diseases meeting; she served a 10-year term as an editor of "Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy," a journal published by the American Society of Microbiology; and she currently serves on the Program Committee of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Murray is an active member of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and is in her second-term as treasurer. She graduated from The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School in Dallas in 1973. She then spent six years training in internal medicine and infectious diseases at Harvard Medical School's Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, followed by six months in Thailand conducting research at the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences.
Cesar A. Arias, M.D., Ph.D., received his medical degree from Universidad El Bosque, Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia in 1992 and his Ph.D. in Molecular Biology and Microbiology Biochemistry from The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom in 2000. He completed his internal medicine residency and infectious disease fellowship at The University of Texas Medical School at Houston and The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in 2008 in the Clinical Investigator Pathway. His research interests include the clinical and molecular aspects of antimicrobial resistance with emphasis on Gram-positive bacteria. Arias is also the director of the Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, Universidad El Bosque, located in Colombia, South America.
Source: Melissa McDonald
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Visit our mrsa / drug resistance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/137171.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/137171.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Growing Super Bugs?
posted by Mother Matteson on 1 Feb 2009 at 10:16 pmI am seriously concerned that companies are actually growing/creating these super bugs. I have recently been researching the GMO technology used in crops. The transfer techniques and marker genes are usually antibiotic resistant bacteria. e-coli, salmonella, aspergillus, etc. The creators claim to shut off some part of the gene, but the reality has been proven that the bacteria are often left in the plants, which can transfer to the soil from some plants, and then can cross with other bacteria and potentially also be taken up by other plants.
Not to mention cross pollination and all the other modes of transport for genes and bacteria. One study proved that those bacteria can actually be taken into the very cells of a plant where the plant itself is then growing the bacteria. Then these bacteria can also create a new relationship within our digestive system. These companies that are busy patenting (to own) and releasing these transgenic plants estimated the risk of these occurrences from the antibiotic resistant bacteria they use, at about one in a billion chance of coming in contact with the right bacteria in nature for the potential risk of cross mutations.
Unfortunately does anyone consider that it is possible to have about a billion bacteria in a teaspoon of soil? Based on calculated estimates of the number of bacteria in earths atmosphere, those mutations could possibly be occurring 10 times a second. When I look at statistics, I see a doubling of foodborn illness outbreaks that seem to co-incide with the timing of the commercial release of these transgenic crops. Even co-inciding with the transgenic plant varieties themselves. Tomatoes, melons, etc.
These plants are some of the earliest releases of GM plants. Is anyone researching this possible link. I can't imagine why anyone would want to put an anitbiotic resitant bacterial gene into plants but that seems to be the easiest route for them to try to own the plants. I thinks it's all about the money. They claim this technology is going to feed the ever growing population. I wonder if the only truth in that statement is based on possibly reducing the population, through the potential risk of worldwide epidemics from antibiotic resistant bacterial and foodborne illnesses? I sure hope someone starts to do more research in this area, because they are starting on the animals now too.
I don't want to eat mutated food, and think it is posing a huge risk to our health and the enviroment.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



