Guideline For Treating Chronic Non-Cancer Pain With Opioid Medications
Main Category: Pain / AnestheticsAlso Included In: Arthritis / Rheumatology; Palliative Care / Hospice Care; Back Pain
Article Date: 09 Feb 2009 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.33 (6 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
A national panel of pain management experts representing the American Pain Society (APS) and the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) has published the first comprehensive, evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist clinicians in prescribing potent opioid pain medications for patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The long-awaited guideline appears in the current issue of The Journal of Pain, http://www.jpain.org.
To create this guideline, researchers in the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) at Oregon Health & Science University collaborated with the APS and AAPM for two years, reviewing more than 8,000 published abstracts and nonpublished studies to assess clinical evidence on which the new recommendations are based.
"This guideline was a true multidisciplinary effort that sought to address in a balanced manner the many challenging issues that clinicians face with regard to when and how to prescribe opioids for chronic noncancer pain," said Roger Chou, M.D., principal investigator; director of the American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Program; scientific director of the Oregon Evidence-Based Practice Center at OHSU; and associate professor of medical informatics and clinical epidemiology, and medicine (general internal medicine and geriatrics) in the OHSU School of Medicine.
"A key part of this process was performing a comprehensive literature review to inform the recommendations - though an important take-home message is that even though the recommendations represent the best judgment of the panel based on the currently available literature, there is still a lot of research that needs to be done."
The expert panel concluded that opioid pain medications are safe and effective for carefully selected, well-monitored patients with chronic non-cancer pain. They made 25 specific recommendations and achieved unanimous consensus on nearly all.
Opioid prescribing has increased significantly due to growing professional acceptance that the drugs can relieve chronic non-cancer pain, and the guideline acknowledges there are widespread concerns about increases in prescription opioid abuse, addiction and diversion.
Opioids, such as morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone and fentanyl are potent analgesics. They traditionally have been used to relieve pain following surgery, from cancer and at the end of life. Today opioids are used widely to relieve severe pain caused by chronic low-back injury, accident trauma, crippling arthritis, sickle cell, fibromyalgia, and other painful conditions.
Diligent Patient Monitoring Is Essential
A key recommendation urges clinicians to continuously assess patients on chronic opioid therapy by monitoring pain intensity, level of functioning and adherence to prescribed treatments. Periodic drug screens should be ordered for patients at risk for aberrant drug behavior.
Other recommendations in the APS/AAPM clinical practice guideline include:
- Methadone: Use of methadone for pain management has increased dramatically but few trials have evaluated its benefits and harms for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Methadone, therefore, should be started at low doses and titrated slowly. Because of its long half-life and variable pharmacokinetics, the panel recommends methadone not be used to treat breakthrough pain or as an as-needed medication.
- Abusers: Chronic opioid therapy must be discontinued in patients known to be diverting their medication or in those engaging in serious aberrant behaviors.
- Breakthrough Pain: As-needed opioids can be prescribed based on initial and ongoing analysis of therapeutic benefit versus risk.
- High Doses: Patients who need high doses of opioids (200 mg daily of morphine or equivalent) should be evaluated for adverse events on an ongoing basis, and clinicians should consider rotating pain medications when patients experience intolerable side effects or inadequate benefit despite appropriate dose increases.
- Driving and Work Safety: Patients should be educated about the greater risk for impairment when starting chronic opioid therapy and counseled not to drive or engage in potentially dangerous work if impaired.
- Pregnancy: Clinicians should counsel women about risks of opioids in pregnancy and encourage minimal or no use of chronic opioid therapy unless potential benefits outweigh risks.
###
About Oregon Health & Science University
Oregon Health & Science University is the state's only health and research university and Oregon's only academic health center. OHSU is Portland's largest employer and the fourth largest in Oregon (excluding government). OHSU's size contributes to its ability to provide many services and community support activities not found anywhere else in the state. It serves patients from every corner of the state, and is a conduit for learning for more than 3,400 students and trainees. OHSU is the source of more than 200 community outreach programs that bring health and education services to every county in the state.
What are Opioids?
For more information on what opioids are, and opioid-induced constipation (OIC), please see:All About Opioids and Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
Source: Tamara Hargens-Bradley
Oregon Health & Science University
Visit our pain / anesthetics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/138282.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/138282.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Please Reconsider Recommendation Regarding Methadone
posted by Lynn Hozak on 29 Oct 2009 at 11:01 amThank you for addressing this crisis.
I've worked in the chemical dependency field for 6 years and have never experienced the high death rate that has been occurring in the last 3 years. The market has completely switched from cocaine/meth (although it does still exist) to Rx pain killers, usually mixed with Benzo's (especially, Xanax) which should be completely avoided since this combination is the main cause of the sky rocket in death rates of our youth. Unfortunately, physicians and the medical community is not understanding or respecting this fact (or addiction in general). Please hear me out. Although I do not have all of the answers, I do know some absolutes that I must share.
I have never actually seen a person be able to get off of Methadone, although I know that it has happened and does occur (usually in death, but not always). Titration occurs however, success is usually temporary and please remember, Methadone is the cheapest fix for street value, thanks to the low cost, so professionals are many times not aware that their goal of "titration" is in reality just temporary, used to supplement street use, and/or until another health care professional can be secured. Anyone who knows will inform you that Methadone is the most difficult drug to stop (moreso than heroin) on a permanent basis. The fact that your panel has not removed Methadone from the list of options that treat pain in an outpatient setting seriously damages the credibility of these recommendations and conclusions. I know that is difficult to hear because of all of the effort that was put into this. The fact that once a person begins to use Methadone, the dependence level (which becomes synonymous with addiction AT THIS LEVEL) is so powerful, that substance abuse professionals (who, based upon personal experience which is the only true knowledge) will tell you that you have just issued an "until death do we part" sentence.
Methadone should remain a treatment in the field of addiction for those who already have the "until death do we part" sentence by their own doing...NOT EVER ISSUED BY PRESCRIPTION FROM A MEDICAL PROVIDER WHO TRUELY CARES FOR PEOPLE AND HUMANITY. There are other medications, unfortunately since drug companies are on to "dependence" at levels that become enmeshed with addiction so that one becomes unable to differentiate. Methadone is just the obvious, "no brainer" that needs to be removed permanently as an option for use in the OP setting (should only be used for end-stage death, IF it is to remain as an option at all) for those who have taken an oath to "above all, do no harm." Until this is accomplished, AS A STARTING POINT, (since the drug companies have already developed equivalents and will no doubt, continue to do so) the reputation of the medical community will continue to be compromised and will continue to display what little handle it has on this issue. Physicians and experts will continue to be confused and used as pawns in an epidemic manner (since health care has taken on the role of what used to be the black market drug dealer). Since there are either none or very few true experts on this subject, you need to rely on those of us who have over 10 years of recovery (if you can find us)...we are not on your panels because your panels only consist of non-addicts. It is not possible for a non-addict to ever adequately address this issue without the equal representation of addiction professionals who are blessed to be at least 10 years in recovery.
I thank your panel for effort, time and humanity in addressing this badly needed issue (on behalf of the patients, addicts and the 5 physicians who have been and are continuing to be prosecuted in this small town of Owosso, Michigan). Please continue your work on an ongoing basis and consider these insights.
Respectfully submitted,
Lynn Hozak, LMSW, CAAC (and last year BSN student at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor).
I have to disagree with the statement
posted by Tracy Tully on 18 Sep 2010 at 6:21 amI have to disagree with the statement above as I am not a recovering addict form Heroin, I am recovered and will be for 11 years now. I do agree though that to withdraw from Methadine is worse that doing so with heroin or other opiods drugs. So where is the duty of care to patients, that have an incurable illness, and the last resort for this person is to take Methadone as pain relief as everything else has failed. I am sorry as this is not to offend any professional out there but how can they give proper and appropriate treatment when they have little understanding, true understanding, not from a text book.
The more I speak with so called top cosultants, tjoe more frustrated I get as they have no idea what they are doing to people lives and won't explore other forms of medication that are not opiod based!! Food fot thought!!!!!!!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





