Physical Activity Guidelines Are Too Confusing, Say Researchers
Main Category: Sports Medicine / FitnessAlso Included In: Public Health; Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Article Date: 10 Feb 2009 - 6:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Whether you are defined as leading an active or inactive lifestyle can depend on which country you are in and which guideline your GP picks off the shelf, say researchers at the University of Bath.
Whilst many countries have guidelines recommending the minimum amount of physical activity a person should take to stay healthy, much of this advice is conflicting, making it difficult for healthcare professionals to assess whether a person is getting enough exercise.
Scientists at the School for Health at the University of Bath, working with co-investigator Dr Alan Batterham from the University of Teesside, found that around nine out of every ten men they studied could be categorised as active or sedentary, depending on which guidelines were followed.
Dr Dylan Thompson, senior lecturer at Bath, explained: "Recommended levels of physical activity are supposed to give the public and health providers a guideline of the minimum amount of activity needed for good health, but these messages seem to vary a lot.
"For example, in the UK, the recommendation is that adults should do at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity per day in periods of 10 minutes or more, five times a week.
"In the US, some guidelines recommend an overall volume of activity, recommending an average of 60 minutes of moderate intensity activity per day, but this includes any activity you might do - even if it lasts less than ten minutes.
"So, if you did a couple of two-hour walks at the weekend, and just a little bit of activity during the week, these US guidelines would define you as sufficiently active but according to the UK guidelines from the Department of Health you would be told that you needed to do more.
"Being physically inactive is a major risk factor for heart disease just like high blood pressure and high cholesterol, so it's really important that healthcare professionals are able to identify which people should be getting more physical activity so they can give them appropriate advice and support.
"If you went to the doctor to get your blood pressure or cholesterol checked, you'd expect to get a consistent result each time - we're saying that assessments of physical activity need to be just as stringent."
The researchers, who published their study in the online open access journal PLoS ONE, hope it will lead to a more consistent approach to gauging physical activity.
Dr Alan Batterham, a researcher in the Health and Social Care Institute at Teesside, remarked: "Deciding on whether people are sufficiently active or not depends on where you set the bar. We found that subtle differences in the definition of the minimum amount of physical activity required for health make a big difference to the proportion of people categorised as active or inactive."
Dr Thompson added: "In the long term, we need better evidence about precisely how much physical activity is needed for health, and we need to offer people consistent advice about their physical activity options.
"At the moment, we seem to have a very prescriptive 'one size fits all' approach but the 'size' varies enormously between guidelines. This confusion and inconsistency may be preventing people from taking the message on board that being active can make a huge difference to your health."
Thompson D, Batterham AM, Markovitch D, Dixon NC, Lund AJS, et al. (2009) 'Confusion and Conflict in Assessing the Physical Activity Status of Middle-Aged Men' is published online in PLoS ONE 4(2):e4337.
The University of Bath is one of the UK's leading universities, with an international reputation for quality research and teaching. View a full list of the University's press releases: http://www.bath.ac.uk/news/releases
Useful links
School for Health
University of Bath
Visit our sports medicine / fitness section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/138500.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/138500.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Reply To Physical Activity Guidelines Are Confusing
posted by GR Greenwell M.D. on 11 Feb 2009 at 11:35 amThe Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans fails to provide guidance for the individual's that will assist them in producing the maximum benefit at the least risk.
Your time is your most valuable asset. And you should be attempting to safely gain the maximum benefit from the time you spend exercising. In 1995 the national Institute of health conducted a consensus development conference on exercise and health. That conference concluded that each individual should exercise at the intensity that challenges their capacity. The guidelines are confusing because they do not address identification of each person's capacity and they do not provide a method of measuring "moderate intensity". They offer multiple methods of estimating and individuals moderate intensity. For example you can carry a conversation but you will be unable to sing when you're at a moderate intensity. Most people can safely exercise at an intensity that demonstrates their anaerobic threshold. That is the minimum intensity where the metabolism of the working muscles becomes heterostatic and initiates a neurohormonal cascade that causes heterostasis throughout the body. After a person has determined they can safely exercise at an intensity that demonstrates the development of heterostasis they can identify their capacity for sustained aerobic activity safely. They should decrease their exercise intensity there after each day until they identify the maximum intensity they can sustain for 30 minutes until they identify the maximum the intensity where the heart rate will plateau and remain stable for that period of time.
If they will exercise habitually at the intensity of that heart rate they will gain the maximum benefit at the least risk. As their capacity improves they will have to increase their activity intensity to match their capacity in order for them to stimulate that heart rate to be maintained.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




