Neural Circuitry Of Near-Misses May Explain The Allure Of Gambling
Main Category: Neurology / NeuroscienceAlso Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry; Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs
Article Date: 12 Feb 2009 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A new study demonstrates that when gambling, almost winning promotes significant recruitment of win-related circuitry within the brain and enhances the motivation to gamble. The research, published by Cell Press in the February 12th issue of the journal Neuron, provides insight into why gambling is so attractive and may shed light on why some individuals develop a compulsion to gamble.
Despite the common saying amongst gamblers that "the house always wins," gambling remains a popular form of entertainment. Research has shown that near-misses (such as two cherries on the slot machine) and a sense of control over the game (such as the chance to throw the dice) promote gambling tendencies and may be associated with the addictiveness of gambling. However, little is known about the brain mechanisms involved.
"We devised a series of experiments to elicit near-miss and control phenomena in the laboratory and used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the brain mechanisms underlying these cognitive distortions," explains senior study author Dr. Luke Clark from the Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute at the University of Cambridge.
Dr. Clark and colleagues focused on the ventral striatum and medial frontal cortex, which previous research had implicated in processing rewards and drugs of abuse. They also examined associations between the level of activation in this circuitry during gambling and a subjective measure of gambling propensity.
Near-misses were associated with a significant activation of the ventral striatum and anterior insula, areas that were also activated by unpredictable monetary wins. There was a significant positive relationship between insula activity to near-misses and a questionnaire measure of gambling propensity that is significantly elevated in problem gamblers. Interestingly, the insula has been implicated in drug craving and other addictive behaviors.
Although near-misses were rated by subjects as more unpleasant than full-misses, they also increased the desire to play the game. These subjective effects were only observed when the subject had control over arranging the gamble. The interaction between near misses and personal control was also reflected in the fMRI data in the medial and frontal cortex.
"Gamblers often interpret near-misses as special events, which encourage them to continue to gamble. Our findings show that the brain responds to near-misses as if a win has been delivered, even though the result is technically a loss," offers Dr. Clark. "By linking psychological and neurobiological accounts of gambling, these data inform our understanding of gambling behavior within society, and by extrapolation, the capacity of gambling to become addictive and pathological."
###
The research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and Responsibility in Gambling Trust, and the MRC - Wellcome Trust Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute.
The researchers include Luke Clark, Andrew J. Lawrence, Frances Astley-Jones, and Nicola Gray, all of the Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, in Cambridge, UK.
Source: Cathleen Genova
Cell Press
Visit our neurology / neuroscience section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/138790.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/138790.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Gambling Mentality
posted by Evelyn Haskins on 18 Mar 2009 at 7:36 pmI suggest that this study is very limited.
A study of NON-Gamblers very well may have shown that near misses are MORE punishing than results further away from the mark. (Tolman's Theory -- that not to receive an expected reward is a punishing stimulus.)
Speaking as a NON-gambler.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



