Judge Dismisses Okla. AG Office's Request To Throw Out Case Challenging Ultrasound Law

Main Category: Abortion
Also Included In: MRI / PET / Ultrasound;  Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 03 Mar 2009 - 3:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


Oklahoma County District Court Judge Vicki Robertson on Thursday dismissed the state's motion to throw out a lawsuit filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights that challenges a state law requiring abortion providers to perform ultrasounds on women seeking abortions and describe the images in detail, the Associated Press reports. The law also imposes restrictions on "medical abortion" -- pregnancy termination that induces abortion through medication rather than surgery. Robertson previously issued a temporary injunction blocking enforcement of the law. Another hearing on the case is scheduled for March 30.

The Center for Reproductive Rights -- which filed suit on behalf of Nova Health Systems, which operates a clinic that provides abortion services in Tulsa -- argues in the suit that the law violates numerous provisions of the state constitution, as well as a woman's rights to privacy and abortion. Stephanie Toti, an attorney for the center, said that the law "would chill [the clinic] from performing medical abortions," adding that it would violate a woman's right to free speech under the state constitution. Toti also said that the law would take away a woman's choice by forcing a doctor to provide a description of the fetus, regardless of whether a woman wants to hear the description or not. A doctor could lose his or her license and face a felony charge by not following the protocol, according to Toti.

Teresa Collett, representing the attorney general's office, said the center had no standing to challenge the law in state court and challenged the center's characterization of the privacy protections in the state constitution. Collett said that "the plaintiff is simply trying to bootstrap federal law into the Oklahoma constitution" (Jenkins, Associated Press, 2/26).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "Judge Dismisses Okla. AG Office's Request To Throw Out Case Challenging Ultrasound Law." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 3 Mar. 2009. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/140841.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2009, March 3). "Judge Dismisses Okla. AG Office's Request To Throw Out Case Challenging Ultrasound Law." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/140841.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Abortion

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Abortion News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Abortion Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »