Congressman Roscoe Bartlett Supports Embryonic Stem Cell Research Without Destroying Embryos
Main Category: Stem Cell ResearchArticle Date: 10 Mar 2009 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.4 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
"It is both immoral and scientifically unnecessary to destroy human embryos to obtain embryonic stem cells, so I was disappointed by President Obama's Executive Order today," said Congressman Roscoe Bartlett, who is the only Member of Congress with a PhD in Human Physiology. "I can not support the destruction of innocent human life for the potential benefit of society, especially when I know that it's unnecessary to harm or kill embryos to engage in embryonic stem cell research."
The Dickey-Wicker amendment remains in place so that without legislation, federal funds can not be used to destroy embryos to create new stem lines," noted Congressman Bartlett. "I am glad that the President said he would not take a position on this small and fragile protection of human embryos."
"I have a 100% pro-life voting record," said Congressman Bartlett. "Every human embryo is unique and could become the next Madame Curie or Albert Einstein which is why I oppose destructive embryonic stem cell research. I do support using federal taxpayers' dollars for non-destructive embryonic stem cell research. That is a path that respects both the uniqueness and sanctity of every human life as well as scientific progress."
Congressman Bartlett explained, "Because of my advanced coursework in embryology as part of my doctoral studies in human physiology, I knew it was theoretically possible to remove a few cells from an early stage embryo that could be used to produce a stem cell line without creating a clone or harming the embryo's ability to develop into a baby. I first proposed this in 2001 which was acknowledged by President Bush's Council on Bioethics in their white paper on stem cell research. A repair kit for the child might also be produced from these cells."
"I revere both life and the advancement of knowledge through science," said Congressman Bartlett. "The research regressing adult skin cells backward to an embryonic-like state and then forward to produce other types of cells and tissues is also very exciting. It holds much promise as an alternative ethical path. However, if you will talk to the researchers and the experts in this area as I have, they will tell you that the potential for embryonic stem cell application to medicine should be greater than adult stem cell applications because embryonic stem cells can produce anything and everything that is in the body. That is why it is important to pursue non-destructive ethical embryonic stem cell research."
http://bartlett.house.gov
Visit our stem cell research section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/141696.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/141696.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Regenerative Medicine
posted by Dan on 10 Mar 2009 at 6:58 amBartlett's paradigm regarding embryonic stem cell extration is flawed.
This is science that will save lives, and relief others of incredible suffering.
With patients that have multiple sclerosis, stem cell therapy through retransplantation of healthy cells created as a result of stem cells altered for this disease for these patients with this brutal disease has proven to be incredibly beneficial. Over 75 percent of such patients who received this therapy were void of relapses, as well as the therapy reversing neurological disability in patients with M.S.
The embryos are obtained from IVF clinics that would be destroyed otherwise, the surplus embryos at such facilities. Stem cells are extracted from 5 day old embryos that contain 100 to 200 cells. Hardly a human life being destroyed by science. There are around 300,000 frozen surplus human embryos.
Embryos are certainly not equivalent to human life- they only have the potential for human life.
And the cloning that occurs with stem cell therapy is therapeutic cloning, and not reproductive cloning. They are different methods entirely.
Ask Bartlett why he has an issue with this, and not prenatal genetic screening that happens often that often is a catalyst for abortion.
Dan Abshear
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





