'No Easy Answers' To Questions About Sex Education, Christian Science Monitor Editorial Says
Main Category: Sexual Health / STDsAlso Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health; Women's Health / Gynecology; Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Article Date: 21 Mar 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
After the release of a government report this week showing a rise in the teen birth rate, "ways to curb teen pregnancy have once again become a topic for debate," a Christian Science Monitor editorial states, adding that teen births are "[o]ne of the best signals for what is worst in American society." The editorial continues, "With Democrats now in charge in Washington, the long, bitter struggle between those pushing only sexual-abstinence programs and those emphasizing contraceptive education will likely lean toward the latter." It notes that President Obama and Congress recently cut federal funding for abstinence-only programs "and plan to do more." According to the editorial, the "intensity" of the fight surrounding sex education "implies there are easy answers to this national challenge." However, "there are no easy answers," because "[e]ven the most effective programs only reduce risky sexual behavior among teens by one-third," the editorial says. It adds that "teens may not take any type of sex education seriously if adults fight over it."
The editorial notes the comments of specialist Douglas Kirby, who in a report on sex education programs for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy wrote that "'[c]ommunities need to send clear, consistent messages about appropriate sexual behavior'" and that "'it is important that organizations avoid sending conflicting messages to young people.'" The editorial continues, "What is needed is that all those concerned unite more in dealing with the many factors causing teen pregnancy," including poverty, drugs, domestic abuse and "fatherless homes." It adds that "one reason to unite" is that the "yearly cost in public services for a teen mother is about $4,080."
In addition, there are the issues of the "sexualized culture" of America and the influence of the "role model" teen girls see in "single women having or adopting babies," according to the editorial, which cites the report's finding that four in 10 births in 2007 were to unmarried women. The editorial says that with "each individual teen, parents need to find better ways to talk about sex and make better efforts to instill high values," adding that "[g]irls sometimes see a strategic benefit to early motherhood." The editorial concludes, "More than sex education, it is an unconditional love for each teen, even with a pregnancy, that will help them gain more control and maturity -- and help America reverse this trend" (Christian Science Monitor, 3/19).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our sexual health / stds section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/143157.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/143157.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Timely Yet The Question Remains...
posted by Jagadish Prasad on 23 Sep 2009 at 7:35 pmThe article was quite thought-provoking. But will sex education act as a brake? Perhaps there should be a rethinking on restoring the value system that existed in the US. This is not about Bible thumping fruitcakes but human values that have stood the test of time. Why is no one thinking of this?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




