Consumer Group Cautions Against Jumping To Conclusions In Response To Anti-Meat Study
Main Category: Nutrition / DietArticle Date: 24 Mar 2009 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.33 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1.5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Today the Archives of Internal Medicine will publish "Meat Intake and Mortality," a study from a National Cancer Institute team of epidemiologists. The study's authors claim to have found a relationship between meat consumption and the overall risk of death for white Americans over 50.
But their own data indicate that smoking and a lack of physical activity are strong predictors of early death-facts which have been known for decades. And according to "Meat Intake and Mortality," there is even a relationship between marriage and the risk of death.
Today David Martosko, the Director of Research at the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom, cautioned reporters and policymakers against jumping to conclusions in response to this study's statistical assumptions and vague measurements.
"It's ridiculous to try to separate our diets from our lifestyles," Martosko said. "Nobody eats in a vacuum, and countless variables go into figuring out when we die. This study's data connect mortality with smoking, a lack of exercise, taking daily vitamins, and even marriage. It's silly to suggest that any single factor is the biggest one."
Martosko continued: "Americans should eat a variety of foods, including meat, dairy, whole grains, fruits, and vegetables. All things in moderation. Move your body to burn calories. Take the stairs. Sweat a little. Don't smoke. Anything beyond this kind of simple advice is pure guesswork."
Center for Consumer Freedom
P.O. Box 34557
Washington, DC 20043
United States
Visit our nutrition / diet section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/143465.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/143465.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Inaccurate
posted by John Tjepkema on 25 Mar 2009 at 2:48 amWith regard to your story "Consumer Group Cautions Against Jumping To Conclusions In Response To Anti-Meat Study" it would seem rather inaccurate to call the Center for Consumer Freedom a consumer group, because it appears that most of their funding comes from industry. They are officially nonprofit, but that status has been challenged.
With few exceptions I think that your stories are excellent and I find them very helpful.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







