ATS Supports FDA Tobacco Legislation: Crucial Bill Reaches Floor Of House
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingAlso Included In: Respiratory / Asthma
Article Date: 05 Apr 2009 - 4:00 PDT
More than a decade after being first proposed, and millions of tobacco-related deaths later, FDA regulation of tobacco is close to becoming a reality. Bi-partisan legislation co-sponsored by Representatives Henry Waxman and Todd Platts is currently on the floor of the House that, if passed, would give the FDA the authority to oversee and regulate tobacco marketing and sales in the U.S.
Nationally, there are more than 400,000 tobacco-related deaths annually in the U.S. and every day 3,000 teens who try cigarettes and become permanent smokers. That is why members of both parties, the President and, most importantly, the overwhelming majority of the American public believe The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act is a necessary step to reduce smoking among all Americans and prevent a new generation of American from becoming enslaved to the lethal tobacco addiction.
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, on the other hand would establish effective FDA regulation of tobacco products would protect children, improve health and save lives in North Carolina and across the nation.
"The Waxman-Platts bill needs to pass and it needs to pass now," said American Thoracic Society President-elect J. Randall Curtis, M.D., M.P.H., who is a professor of medicine and public health at the department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Harborview Medical Center and the University of Washington in Seattle, Washington. "It is simply unconscionable that we go forward without this bill and thereby allow the tobacco industry to continue to addict our children and to enslave another generation to their deadly product."
The bipartisan legislation pending before Congress would give the FDA authority to:
- Restrict tobacco advertising, especially to children.
- Ban candy-flavored cigarettes.
- Require tobacco companies to disclose the contents of tobacco products, changes to their products and research about the health effects of their products.
- Require changes in tobacco products, such as the removal or reduction of harmful ingredients.
- Prohibit health claims about so-called "reduced risk" products that are not scientifically proven or that would discourage current tobacco users from quitting or encourage new users to start.
- Require larger, more effective health warnings on tobacco products.
- Prohibit advertising or terms that imply health claims such as "low-tar," "light" and "mild" that have mislead consumers into believing that certain cigarettes are safer than others.
However, just as this historic measure is on the brink of passing Congress and being sent to a president who has already indicated he'll sign it, Senators Richard Burr and Kay Hagen, both of North Carolina, have introduced a bill designed to derail this effort.The Burr-Hagen legislation would create a new department altogether to oversee tobacco regulation, but the proposal is flawed- riddled with restrictions, loopholes and hurdles that will make it difficult, if not impossible, to effectively regulate tobacco products and protect public health.
"Creating a new agency with an unproven record and no established oversight will merely delay and dilute the true purpose of the original legislation," said Dr. Curtis. "Ironically, while Senators Burr and Hagen may be acting to protect the financial interests of their state, they are overlooking its most valuable asset: its people. In North Carolina, tobacco kills nearly 14,000 people and costs the state $2.5 billion in health care bills each year."
"FDA regulation of tobacco - as outlined in the Waxman-Platts Bill - is clearly the right thing to do and this is clearly the right time to do it. Further delay will only add to the toll of death and disease caused by tobacco use in this country."
About the ATS
Founded in 1905, the American Thoracic Society is the world's leading medical association dedicated to advancing pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine. The Society has more than 15,000 members who prevent and fight respiratory disease around the globe, through research, education, patient care and advocacy.
Source
American Thoracic Society
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/145022.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/145022.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Government Controls???
posted by Susan Carpenter on 5 Apr 2009 at 2:40 pmWhat will the government tell us we can do next? I do smoke - my grandmother smoked for 60+ years and she died at the age of 90 - just from old age. The cigarettes she smoked for most of her life did not have the additives we have now.
Why not just allow us to smoke tobacco? Just tobacco? We wouldn't smoke as much. These big companies are horrible, I agree. They add things to make them more addictive. Yes, I agree. But, if we want to smoke, why not just make tobacco, no additives? Like my grandmother used to smoke.
But most importantly, this makes me wonder how far will the government go in telling us what we can and can't do?
Is not fat meat, sugar, preservatives and additives to food dangerous? (And don't get me started on the big medicine-makers and all the stupid advertisements I see on tv for pills that are not good for people to use.) Is there any warners on bags of sugar - warning this may be addictive and harmful. Overindulgence may lead to obesity, sugar diabetes, harding of the arteries, etc. I have never seen a warning on the meat at the grocery stores - warning meat may be treated to slow spoilage - or warning cows may have been fed concrete dust to add pounds at the sale barn - or warning cows may have come in contact with poisonous insecticides - or ... I think you get my drift.
Or do we have ads on tv (like they do for cigarettes) that show a child crying in the street because they lost their mother and equating it the feeling of loss of a life - towards McDonald's or any other fast foods - I can just see it - a child in the crowd crying because he lost his mother to a major heart attack from eating big macs all her life - her short, fat life. Nothing could be any unhealthier than a regular diet of fast food - with sugar added into ingredients to keep you addicted and coming back for more artery clogging food. Everyone knows how highly addictive sugar is. It was proven years ago, but yet I still don't see that warning on any sugar label I have ever seen.
It's not the tobacco - it's the big companies that add all the extra ingredients. Just let us have our tobacco!!!
I think people have gotten away from good sense. We don't need the government telling us what to do. We just need to remember - moderation in everything.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






