Oncological Followup After Radical Cystectomy For Bladder Cancer-Is There Any Benefit?
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 14 Apr 2009 - 0:00 PDT
UroToday.com - The rationale for routine radiographic, blood, and urine studies after a cancer therapy in asymptomatic patients is to identify metastases early and administer effective therapy and thus improve survival compared to patients who are symptomatic.
In this article, Dr. Bjoern Volkmer and colleagues evaluated 1,270 patients who underwent a radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Routine radiographic, blood, and urine studies were done every 6 to 12 months. 49% of the patients had recurrent disease with 20 years of follow-up. Of the 444 patients with recurrent disease, 154 were asymptomatic and 290 had symptoms, most commonly pain, ileus, urinary retention, flank pain, hematuria, and a palpable mass. 41% had a local recurrence and 73% had distant metastases. The overall survival rate 1, 2 and 5 years after first recurrence was 22.5%, 10.1% and 5.5% in asymptomatic patients, and 18.9%, 8.2% and 2.9% in symptomatic patients, respectively (log rank not significant). Therefore, no survival advantage was found in asymptomatic compared to symptomatic patients.
If routine follow-up was important you would have expected the survival to be better in the asymptomatic patients. This suggests that early treatment of metastatic bladder cancer does not lead to improved survival. Symptom-guided follow-up examinations may provide similar survival rates at a lower cost.
Volkmer BG, Kuefer R, Bartsch GC Jr, Gust K, Hautmann RE
J Urol. 2009 Apr;181(4):1587-93
10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.112
Written by UroToday.com Contributing Editor David P. Wood, MD
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2009 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/145871.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/145871.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Symptomatic Vs. Asymtomatic
posted by Anon on 15 Apr 2009 at 7:44 pmWhat does that mean? Anyone who has had any cancer has a pain that they think is symptomatic. It goes with the trauma of having cancer. As for Bladder Cancer its the least funded of all the cancers. So what are the tests supposed to prove if someone is symptomatic? Things like ileus, hydronephrosis, B12 deficiency, metabolic disturbances, bladder stones...well there's no mistaking them..well maybe the B12..that must be monitored by a serum test or MMI. But....."This suggests that early treatment of metastatic bladder cancer does not lead to improved survival." statement is unfortunately true. There is no Plan B. This cancer needs research and funding.
20 Yrs Of Follow Up?
posted by patricia on 28 Sep 2009 at 8:48 pmDid i read that correctly? That almost half over a 20 yr period have a recurrence? If you would have said 2 yrs I would agree...but 20yrs? First time i've heard that one. And yes there is no plan B.....there is barely a plan A.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




