Mechanism Of Bone Metastasis: The Role Of Osteoprotegerin And Of The Host-Tissue Microenvironment-Related Survival Factors
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyArticle Date: 26 Apr 2009 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Prostate cancer, the most frequently occurring cancer in men, very often metastasizes to bone, as more than 84% of patients demonstrate skeletal lesions (1, 2-3). Although such metastases have been traditionally characterized to be osteoblastic, today it is well known that both bone formation and resorption are dysregulated and participate in the metastatic lesions (4). Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the role of osteoprotegerin (OPG), a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily, in the context of prostate cancer, as its overexpression by tumor cells could partly explain the osteoblastic phenotype of metastasis. (1, 2-3)
OPG has various biological functions including bone remodeling, as well as the protection of metastatic prostate cancer cells from apoptotic effects of TRAIL - and therefore provides tumor cells producing OPG with survival advantages. TRAIL (TNF- Related Apoptosis - Inducing Ligand) is secreted by monocytes and is responsible for their ability to induce the apoptotic mechanisms of tumor cells in vivo. OPG facilitates the survival of prostate cancer cells in vitro and this anti-apoptotic property seems to be due to its ability to bind to and inhibit the TRAIL death-activating receptors (2).
The first results of these investigations have revealed that prostate cancer cells produce and secrete OPG (2). Moreover, it has been shown that OPG can inhibit osteoclastogenesis (3,5). More specifically, prostate cancer cells can produce sRANKL, which may be responsible for the CaP-mediated osteoclastogenesis. OPG was shown to bind to sRANKL and completely prevent the establishment of mixed osteoblastic- osteolytic tumor lesions in bone, although it did not prevent the tumor growth. All together, these data show that the ability of OPG to prevent tumor growth in bone is affected by factors in the bone microenvironment. Moreover, inhibition of osteoclastic activity can prevent the establishment of prostate cancer in the skeleton (3,5).
Other in vitro studies (6) have revealed that OPG overexpression would decrease the growth of prostate metastatic tumors in the bone, without affecting the proliferation of cancer cells as a result of decreased bone lysis. Consequently, OPG influences the metastatic lesions in bone in an indirect manner.
Several studies have also been made to measure the levels of OPG in the serum of prostate cancer patients, in association with the progression of the disease. OPG serum levels are increased in patients with advanced prostate cancer and bone metastasis, compared with patients with primary disease, or without osseous lesions (7). These increased serum levels did not correlate well with serum PSA levels.
On the contrary, a more recent study (8) has revealed that human prostate cancer cells express RANK, RANKL and OPG in increased levels. In case of bone metastasis, the ratio OPG/RANKL was high. Interestingly, the overexpression of OPG/RANK/RANKL was observed in patients with other markers of advanced disease, such as Gleason score, TNM stage and serum PSA levels.
Several members of the TGF-_, such as TGF-_2, superfamily are also candidate mediators of osteoblastic metastasis, as in vivo they stimulate new bone formation (9-10). Prostate tumor cells express FGFs including FGF-1, -2 and -8 causing osteoblastic metastases.
Preventing a bone lesion from developing and limiting the progression of an established bone metastasis should be the primary goals of treating metastatic bone disease. However, the currently available therapies for bone metastasis such as bisphosphonates, radiotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals and surgery focus only on symptomatic management (11, 12).
Figure: Mechanisms of osteoblastic lesions in cancer. Tumor cells directly contribute to osteoblastic lesions by producing ET-1 (endothelin-1), transforming growth factor _ (TGF-_), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs).
1. B. Schaller, A. Merlo, E. Kirsch, et al., Prostate-specific antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid leads to diagnosis of solitary cauda equina metastasis: a unique case report and review of the literature, Br J Cancer 77 (1998) 2386-9.
2. I. Holen, P.I. Crouche, F.C. Hamdy, et al., Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a survival factor for human prostate cancer cells, Cancer Res 62 (2002) 1619-1623.
3. J. Zhang, J. Dai, Y. Qi, et al., Osteoprotegerin inhibits prostate cancer induced osteoclastogenesis and prevents tumor growth in the bone, J Clin Invest 107 (2001) 1235-1244.
4. T.A. Guisse, K.S. Mohammad, G. Clines, et al., Basic mechanisms responsible for osteolytic and osteoblastic bone metastases, Clin Cancer Res 12 (2006) 6213s-6216s.
5. R.E. Miller, M. Roudier, J. Jones, et al., RANK ligand inhibition plus docetaxel improves survival and reduces tumor burden in a murine model of prostate cancer bone metastasis, Mol Cancer Ther. 7 (2008) 2160-9.
6. E. Corey, L.G. Brown, J.A. Kiefel, et al. Vessella, Osteoprotegerin in prostate cancer bone metastases, Cancer Res 65 (2005) 1710-1718.
7. J.M. Brown, E. Corey, Z.D. Lee, et al., Osteoprotegerin and rank ligand expression in prostate cancer, Urology 57 (2001) 611-616.
8. G. Chen, K. Sircar, A. Aprikian, et al., Expression of RANK/ RANKL/ OPG in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer as markers of disease stage and functional regulation, Cancer 107 (2006) 289-298.
9. G.R. Mundy, Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities, Nat Rev Cancer 2 (2002) 584-493.
10. T.A. Guisse, Molecular mechanisms of osteolytic bone metastases, Cancer 88 (2000) 2892-2898.
11. G.D. Roodman, Mechanisms of bone metastasis, N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 1655-1664.
12. R.E. Coleman, Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies, Cancer Treat Rev 27 (2001) 165-176.
Written by Sofia Fili, Maria Karalakia, and Bernhard Schalle as part of Beyond the Abstract on UroToday.com
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2009 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/147585.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/147585.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



