New York Times Columnist Discusses 'Complex' Issues Surrounding Use Of Interpretation Services

Main Category: Primary Care / General Practice
Also Included In: Public Health;  Medical Students / Training
Article Date: 27 Apr 2009 - 4:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


New York Times columnist and physician Pauline Chen examines a new study by researchers from the University of California-San Francisco and at Yale University that examined language barriers between patients and doctors of health providers at two teaching hospitals. Chen says that the study shows a "complex" situation where many of the doctors opted against using trained medical interpreters, even if they were available, because of "their own time constraints." She writes that "despite their personal misgivings, the doctors often felt that this kind of shortcut was acceptable and well within the norms of their professional environment."

According to Chen, "Doctors will triage their conversations with patients, categorizing discussions about advanced directives or risky medications as 'high stakes,' and those that occur during routine rounding on a stable patient as 'low stakes.'" She continues, "Doctors will then tend to use interpreters in 'high stakes' conversations but will muddle through 'low stakes' topics themselves, resorting to gestures, mimicry or bilingual family members in order to communicate." Chen describes one particular experience she had with a patient, writing, "Although interpreters were available at all times, it would take time ... for one to arrive, and then the translation itself could slow things down" when a "couple dozen more patients were always waiting."

Chen writes that doctors' assumption that conversations during routine exams are not "important" enough for an interpreter might play a role in the health care disparities that non-English-speaking patients face.

The authors of the study noted that while time and costs can affect a physician's decision to use interpretation services, improvements need to be made to ensure that interpretation services are a more centralized and easy option for physicians (Chen, New York Times, 4/23).

An abstract of the study is available online.

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

© 2009 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our primary care / general practice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Kaiser. "New York Times Columnist Discusses 'Complex' Issues Surrounding Use Of Interpretation Services." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 27 Apr. 2009. Web.
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/147610.php>

APA
Kaiser. (2009, April 27). "New York Times Columnist Discusses 'Complex' Issues Surrounding Use Of Interpretation Services." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/147610.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Primary Care / General Practice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Primary Care News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Primary Care / General Practice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »