What Research Should You Believe? Cities Should Think Twice Before Turning Off Street Lights To Reduce Carbon Footprint
Main Category: Water - Air Quality / AgricultureArticle Date: 13 May 2009 - 3:00 PDT
'What Research Should You Believe? Cities Should Think Twice Before Turning Off Street Lights To Reduce Carbon Footprint'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2 (1 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 1 posts |
Last year during Earth Hour, the City of Kingston delayed turning on some street lights until 9 pm to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But a review of 15 published studies by the Cochrane Collaboration warns that municipalities should think twice about such a practice. The studies showed that street lighting reduced total crashes by between 32% and 55%, and fatal injury crashes by 77%. "In the United Kingdom, an increasing number of local councils are looking to turn off some public street lighting in a move to reduce costs and carbon emissions.
The potential adverse road safety effect of such a policy should be carefully considered in light of our findings," said lead researcher, Fiona Beyer, of the Institute of Health and Society at the University of Newcastle in the U.K. CIHR is a partner in the Canadian Cochrane Network and Centre.
Did you know: The typical Canadian municipality spends about one-third of its energy budget on street lighting. This can be as high as 75% for smaller, rural municipalities.
Source
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Visit our water - air quality / agriculture section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
24 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/149819.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/149819.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
It's Not The Lights, It's Gaia
posted by derekcrane on 14 May 2009 at 4:18 amThe number of human lives saved by any public policy is of no concern to members of the environmental movement. Perhaps you may attract some attention if some polar bears were saved by illuminating roads and highways, but human lives are not an element to consider in any cost/benefit analysis.
After all, according to a key tenet of environmentalism, mankind is a disease on the living organism known as Gaia and should be quickly eliminated , or at least minimized to restore the health of the patient which environmentalists have assumed responsibility.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'What Research Should You Believe? Cities Should Think Twice Before Turning Off Street Lights To Reduce Carbon Footprint'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




