Tobacco Control Must Be Elevated As A Public Health Priority
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingArticle Date: 17 May 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.6 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
An Essay published this week in the open access journal PLoS Medicine calls for the President Obama to "make a strong public commitment" to tobacco control by mobilizing US Government departments and agencies to achieve a coherent policy after eight years of neglect.
In their paper, Thomas Novotny and Joshua Yang, researchers in tobacco control and public health from San Diego State University and University of California San Francisco respectively, emphasize the huge potential for the US Government to reduce tobacco mortality and morbidity if action is co-ordinated across agencies. Presently tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States - responsible for at least 443,000 deaths between 2002 and 2004 - and exacerbates health disparities in the country, with African Americans, Native Americans, people in poverty and those with lower educational attainment suffering from a higher burden of the diseases and disabilities that result from smoking.
Critically the authors argue that simple tobacco control measures - such as creating smoke-free environments, and engaging a mass media public education campaign - can come at little cost to the government. Programs that do require investment, such as providing comprehensive smoking cessation services and expanding regulation over tobacco products, marketing and promotion, could eventually yield economic return. Smoking is currently a huge fiscal burden, resulting in the loss of $96.8 billion in productivity losses and over $75 billion in annual US medical expenditures.
The paper outlines the agencies that can play an important part in a revitalized approach and stress three key tobacco control issues that should be prioritized to frame a national policy coherence plan. Firstly, the ratification of the first ever global health treaty, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) - which was not sent to the Senate by President George W. Bush - could act as a framework for national policy. The bill to grant the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory authority over tobacco products, recently passed by the US House of Representatives, should contain the strongest possible language without concessions to the tobacco industry. And thirdly, the authors point towards settling the case that the Department of Justice brought against the tobacco industry, currently in appeal, which orders the industry to cease false and deceptive activities.
"We believe this change in direction is based on sound science, is acceptable to the almost 80% of non-smoking Americans and the 70% of smoking Americans who want to quit, and in the best fiscal and health interests of the United States", say the authors. Furthermore, by implementing the FCTC the United States can demonstrate international commitment to tobacco control and spur other countries to implement the treaty.
Funding: Financial support for this project was provided by National Cancer Institute Fellowship Funding CA-113710-02 (JSY). The funder had no role in the preparation of the manuscript.
Citation: "Policy Coherence in US Tobacco Control: Beyond FDA Regulation."
Yang JS, Novotny TE (2009)
PLoS Med 6(5): e1000079. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000079
Source
Plos Medicine
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/150275.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/150275.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Patronising Compromise Of Rights
posted by Dave Atherton on 18 May 2009 at 11:46 amAs someone who fights for smokers rights in the UK for Freedom2Choose, the anti smoking lobby seem very happy to play fast and loose with civil rights. As a heavy smoker I know my RR for lung cancer is 9-10 and aware of other medical conditions that might or might not be exacerbated by smoking. Smoking is something I thoroughly enjoy, especially with a beer or a glass of wine. There must be not one person in the USA who is not aware of the risks. It is highly patronising of Thomas Novotny and Joshua Yang, to say that "Americans, Native Americans, people in poverty and those with lower educational attainment" are "victims." Are you saying that middle class caucasians are superior people?
Concern for health has now turned to control and this is unacceptable. Property rights are being driven over roughshod, not only in bars but now in some places including someone's own home. People are not behaving to your prescribed view of the world, this is really akin to the "Thought Police" in George Orwell's 1984.
Has anyone done any research into when people give up what they replace their "addiction" with? I am sure some are virtuous and take up the gym or jogging. Do they drink more alcohol, do they take controlled substances? Prescription drugs like Prozac are being prescribed in record numbers in the UK and USA has this been researched for a causal relationship as smoking has decreased. Indeed has the rise in consumption of cocaine, heroin and cannabis been at the expense of smoking prevalence.
I am sick to death of the nanny and now the bully state interfering with my rights. Butt out!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





