Widely Used Cancer Drug Bevacizumab Associated With Significantly Increased Risk Of Gastrointestinal Perforation
Main Category: GastroIntestinal / GastroenterologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 27 May 2009 - 5:00 PDT
Cancer patients treated with the widely used drug bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy are at significantly greater risk of potentially life-threatening gastrointestinal (GI) perforations (a hole in the wall of the stomach, small intestine or large bowel)-particularly patients with advanced colorectal cancer and renal cell cancer, according to an Article published Online First and in the June edition of The Lancet Oncology.
Bevacizumab belongs to a class of drugs called angiogenesis inhibitors, that slow down the growth of tumours by cutting off their blood supply. Bevacizumab has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of many types of cancer including colorectal cancer, renal cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer. Despite concerns about the use of bevacizumab and GI perforation, including a black-box warning issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to discontinue bevacizumab in patients with GI perforation, the link is not well established and so far no trials have proved a significant association.
To resolve this uncertainty, Shenhong Wu and colleagues from Stony Brook University Cancer Center, New York, did a meta-analysis of 17 randomised trials involving 12 294 patients with a variety of solid tumours to assess the role of bevacizumab in GI perforation. The authors also examined whether the dose of bevacizumab or having a specific type of cancer was related to a higher risk of developing GI perforation.
Findings showed that the incidence of GI perforation was 0.9%, with a two-fold increased risk of GI perforation in patients receiving bevacizumab compared with controls, and a mortality of 21.7% in patients who developed GI perforation. Interestingly, the likelihood of developing GI perforation was found to be dose-dependent. Versus controls, lower doses of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/kg per week) increased risk of GI perforation by 61%; while at a higher dose (5 mg/kg per week), the risk of a GI perforation increased by 167%.
The incidence of GI perforation with bevacizumab also varied among different tumours-with the highest incidence observed among patients with advanced colorectal cancer and renal cell cancer, and the lowest in patients with pancreatic cancer.
The authors conclude that: "As bevacizumab is extensively used in routine cancer treatment...it will be increasingly important to recognise symptoms indicating perforation and intervene promptly to reduce morbidity and fatality...our study might help to identify a subset of patients receiving bevacizumab at high risk of bevacizumab-associated perforation."
Link to Article
Source
The Lancet Oncology
Visit our gastrointestinal / gastroenterology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/151514.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/151514.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Avastin And Wound Dehiscence
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 27 May 2009 at 11:33 amThere are good sides and bad sides to all drugs. What needs to be learned, and obviously sometimes the hard way, is how do drugs work and how to use them best. This is particularly true when they are biologics. They can be working in ways and speed that we aren't used to.
Avastin is indeed associated with wound dehiscence. The vascular inhibitory effects predispose to these complications. Although vascular targeting is a useful adjunct to therapy, the mechanism of action may more reflect the Vascular Permeability Factor effects and less the anti-angiogenesis effects.
Whiz bang therapies often get a pass on toxicities because they are.......Well..... just so darn cool. Herceptin in the adjuvant setting is but another example. The problem is that few drugs work the way we think and few physicians take the time to think through what it is they are using them for. It is a learning process - and of course - it can be a painful one.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





