In A "David Against Goliath" Move, SKIN.NY(R), Takes On Boots For Misleading Public By Making False Claims About No.7 Protect & Perfect Products, UK
Main Category: DermatologyAlso Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 29 May 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Cult skincare brand SKIN.NY(R) have issued legal proceedings against beauty giant, Boots the Chemist, for misleading the public. In a recent blaze of publicity, Boots the Chemist claimed that their much-lauded Boots No.7 Protect and Perfect was the first anti-wrinkle cream to be proven to be effective in clinical trials. This is untrue. In fact, SKIN.NY Radical Restructure Complex(R) containing QAL-100(R) was the first complex skin cream with proven clinical trials published in the BJD over 6 years earlier in October 2003.
SKIN.NY(R) also gives faster, broader skincare results. SKIN.NY(R) achieves more in three months than Boots No.7 does in six - SKIN.NY(R) delivers an additional 10% in wrinkle reduction. In fact the "inactive" control cream used in the SKIN.NY(R) study was as effective in 3 months as the Boots Serum was in a year. This also makes SKIN.NY(R) more cost-effective - three month's supply of SKIN.NY(R) costs GBP99.00 whereas six month's of Boots No.7 is GBP197.50.
The facts speak for themselves - the trials
SKIN.NY 3 month's double blind clinical trials with product used twice daily. Trial data published in the British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) February 2003.
Boots No.7 6 month's double-blind clinical trials, 6 month's open trials, product used once daily. Trial data published in The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) April 2009.
What did they test for
SKIN.NY fine lines (measured with objective method laser profilometery, and also with photographic assessment, clinical assessment and self evaluation), deep lines, pore size, pigmentation, bags under the eyes, skin colour, telangiectasia (small dilated blood vessels), visible dryness, scaling, elasticity, tactile roughness
Boots No.7 fine lines/wrinkles, (only clinical assessment, no objective clinical measurement was used) dyspigmentation, overall clinical grade of photo-ageing, tactile roughness
The results
SKIN.NY Facial wrinkles at 3 months - P < 0.031
Improvement of 51% in wrinkle depth (measured with laser profilometry)
78% Overall improvement after 3 months.
Plus decreased pigmentation < 0.007
Decreased under-eye bags P< 0.09
Decreased pore size P< 0.08
Boots No.7 Facial wrinkles at 6 months - P = 0.013
Facial wrinkles at 12 months - P = 0.026
70% overall improvement after 12 months
No visible benefits to pigmentation
No note taken of reduction in under-eye bags or decreased pore size.
Source
SKIN.NY
Visit our dermatology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/151804.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/151804.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




