AARP Endorses Bill To Help Americans Get Care In Their Own Homes
Main Category: Caregivers / HomecareAlso Included In: Nursing / Midwifery; Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP
Article Date: 09 Jun 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.75 (4 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
|
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
More than one million Americans are living in nursing homes, but many would prefer to receive the services they need in their own homes, where they would be more comfortable and potentially save the health care system money in the long run. Unfortunately, many Americans who want to be cared for at home can't because of a costly institutional bias in Medicaid, which pays for nearly two-thirds of the country's nursing home residents. While state Medicaid programs are required to provide nursing home care, home and community-based services that are often less expensive are optional, leaving them first in line to be cut in a poor economy.
AARP is working with members of Congress to end this bias that forces too many Americans out of their homes and costs us all too much. The Association today endorsed the "Empowered at Home Act" (H.R. 2688) sponsored by Representatives Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Diana DeGette (D-CO), which would provide incentives and greater opportunities for states to expand access to home and community-based services. AARP has also endorsed a bipartisan companion bill in the Senate sponsored by Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA).
"Representatives Pallone and DeGette, along with their Senate colleagues, are true champions of health reform," said AARP President Jennie Chin Hansen. "Their common sense legislation will give more Americans a chance to live comfortably in their homes, instead of in often more costly institutions. AARP is proud to endorse the 'Empowered at Home Act,' and we look forward to working with Representatives Pallone and DeGette as well as Senators Kerry and Grassley, to enact this legislation as one of the most important parts of health care reform."
Research by AARP's Public Policy Institute has found 89 percent of people 50-plus want to remain in their homes as they age. Greater access to home and community-based services, along with the help of properly supported family caregivers, could make this goal possible for hundreds of thousands of people who otherwise face life in costly nursing homes. AARP estimates that on average, Medicaid can care for three people with home and community-based services for the same cost as one person in a nursing home.
Hansen added: "There's no excuse for a program as critical as Medicaid to force people into more expensive institutions when we could be saving money and improving the quality of life for so many Americans."
More information on home and community based care is available in AARP's latest fact sheet.
For details on AARP's health reform priorities, including long-term care, visit here.
Source
AARP
Visit our caregivers / homecare section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/153036.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/153036.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Bill To Get Americans Help In Their Homes
posted by Romeo Raabe on 10 Jun 2009 at 1:03 pmVarious government entities HAVE enacted regulations allowing Americans to get care in their homes through Medicaid, and its been a disaster every time. When the care people want is free then everyone wants it. Medicaid is not an entitlement like Medicare or Social Security. You do not get it because you are old, or need assistance with day to day activites. You get it because you are broke! I preemptively decided to purchase LTC insurance to pay for my home care when and if it becomes necessary. If purchased while you are healthy it is relatively inexpensive. If you wait until after a stroke it is either very expensive or not available, kind of like wanting to buy auto insurance after the accident.
If you do not have a nest egg, but do have a house and would like to remain in it when care is needed, you can remove the equity in that house through a reverse mortgage. Put that money in an interest bearing account and use that interest to pay for some LTC insurance. The kids don't want that building, they want the money after you're gone. This way the money remains intact, you get the kind of care you want, where you want it through the insurance, and the kids won't even have to try and sell that old house after your gone. And now with the new Partnership policies, if your need for care exceeds the LTC insurance policy you bought, Medicaid will exempt assets equal to what the polciy has already paid out for your care. Its kind of like the man who prays every day to let him win the lottery, and finally God replies that he has to buy a ticket. We didn't have enough young'uns to put everyone on Medicaid, who's going to pay for it? Let those who can pay, do so and leave Medicaid for the poor it was intended for.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




