California Restaurant Association Asks U.S. Supreme Court To Weigh Employer Mandate Question

Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Also Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 10 Jun 2009 - 6:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated

A California Restaurant Association has asked the Supreme Court to rule on the legality of San Francisco's mandate that employers pay for health care coverage for employees, The San Francisco Chronicle reports.

"The city's first-of-its-kind universal health care program, dubbed Healthy San Francisco, began two years ago and requires that employers with at least 20 employees provide health insurance, set up health care spending accounts or pay into the city's fund. Kevin Westlye, director of the restaurant association, said the fees are incredibly burdensome on restaurant owners - and pointed to the recent failure of two restaurants in Mayor Gavin Newsom's PlumpJack Group as proof." The group, Golden Gate Restaurant Association, has joined others in saying that officials' interest in creating business and jobs conflicts with the burden the mandate places on them.

The association lost its case last fall in federal appeals court and negotiations to come to a compromise have been unfruitful so far. San Francisco Public Health Chief Mitch Katz said the association wants changes that go beyond health care issues: "'I'm disappointed because here we have a program that's already covered more than two-thirds of all the uninsured in San Francisco and is being hailed as a national model, and they're trying to block it.' (San Francisco Mayor Gavin) Newsom has made Healthy San Francisco, which now provides care for 41,000 people, a centerpiece of his run for governor. His press secretary, Nathan Ballard, said the mayor understands the restaurant owners' concerns, but is committed to universal health care."

The Association says its petition focuses mainly on whether the city's Healthy San Francisco program conflicts with the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act that governs benefit programs. The court could decide in October or November whether to hear the case, with a decision on the issue coming in June 2010 (Knight, 6/9).

This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.

© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.



Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Kaiser. "California Restaurant Association Asks U.S. Supreme Court To Weigh Employer Mandate Question." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 10 Jun. 2009. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/153264.php>

APA
Kaiser. (2009, June 10). "California Restaurant Association Asks U.S. Supreme Court To Weigh Employer Mandate Question." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/153264.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Health Insurance / Medical Insurance

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Health Insurance News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Health Insurance / Medical Insurance Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »