Private Insurers Step Into Spotlight On Health Care Reform
Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical InsuranceArticle Date: 22 Jun 2009 - 1:00 PDT
"Don't expect the private insurance industry to go away under any kind of health-care reform initiative. That's because most key health-reform measures gaining momentum in Washington not only leave private health plans intact but also may give them a greater role," The Chicago Tribune reports. Insurers also "got to ride the coattails" of the America Medical Association's support for the private insurance system as President Barack Obama "sought the physicians' support" of his public insurance option. Health plans were "happy that the AMA stripped the words 'public option' from a resolution."
In a new blog launched Wednesday, America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) "quoted media reports from AMA immediate past president Dr. Nancy Nielsen espousing the importance of private health plans." Robert Zirkelback, spokesman for AHIP, said "The AMA can speak for themselves, but there is evidence that a government-run plan would significantly impact providers across the country." While lawmakers are "pushing bills to limit insurers' ability to deny coverage" and "a bipartisan proposal would keep Medicaid and Medicare in business," "analysts see private plans also being involved" (Japsen, 6/19).
Meanwhile, "managed care stocks surged Thursday as the health care reform push wobbled in Washington," AP/Forbes reports. "Edward Jones analyst Steve Shubitz noted that the entire health care sector rose in trading Thursday. But he added that managed care stocks are particularly volatile. 'These stocks kind of trade on emotion,' he said in an interview. 'It's like people now on the margin are saying, 'Maybe there won't be a public plan or maybe... it will be so watered down that it will take a lot of years before it really impacts the private insurance companies" (Murphy, 6/18).
In other insurance news, "five of Colorado's largest health insurance plans - Aetna, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Cigna, Humana and UnitedHealthcare - will contribute money to a pilot program that coordinates medical and reimbursement practices for 17 primary care practice sites in the state, with the goal of improving health care quality and managing costs," the Denver Business Journal reports. "The two-year project is designed to give participating doctors better financial incentives for prescribing preventive care that may improve patients' health and hold down medical costs." It will "cover about 25,000 patients in participating family practices" and will "allow graduates from medical residency programs to participate in the program, in an effort to attract more primary care physicians to the state." The program will be monitored by the Harvard School of Public Health (Mook, 6/18).
This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.
© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/154770.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/154770.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Dual Public/Private Systems For Reform
posted by Bill Watson on 22 Jun 2009 at 4:29 amThe cheapest way to collect money to pay for health care is through a national sales tax, and not by forcing people and companies to purchase questionable insurance, to pay for services, in a system with bloated costs, that has failed so many.
The cheapest, most efficient, best outcome producing, delivery system would be through government owned and operated hospitals and clinics, operated as a civilian VA style system, that would deliver all government funded health care and medications free to seniors and everyone choosing to use government care, no restrictions period.
Businesses that choose public care for their employees will have no financial obligations or any other responsibilities concerning health care.
People who prefer, and could afford to pay for private insurance and care could do so, but no public funding for private systems.
Ask OMB; how much this dual choice, public or private system, would save annually, and what stimulus would it provide for the US economy.
Stand By For Euthanasia
posted by wrvjr on 23 Jun 2009 at 6:20 am"all government funded health care and medications free to seniors"
...standby, as seniors can expect to find that their Government no longer consider them to be "vaible candidates" -and thus no longer eligible -for much of the treatments they have come to expect. This is where the "cost savings' will come from.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




