HIV Antibody Tests Unreliable For Early Infections In Teens

Main Category: HIV / AIDS
Also Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health;  Preventive Medicine;  Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 24 Jun 2009 - 4:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  


Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

4.75 (4 votes)

Healthcare Prof:4 and a half stars

4.5 (2 votes)


A previously healthy teenager shows up at the doctor's office with a sore throat, fever, aches and general malaise. Routine blood tests are normal, an HIV test comes back negative, and the pediatrician sends the patient home with a diagnosis of acute viral infection.

Two weeks later, the teen returns complaining of lingering symptoms and persistent high fevers. This time, a repeat HIV test comes back positive. What happened?

The most commonly used rapid HIV test resulted in a false negative the first time around, which happens quite often during the earliest - and most contagious - stages of HIV infection, known as acute retroviral syndrome (ARS), explains Allison Agwu, M.D., a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Johns Hopkins Children's Center.

Because the rapid HIV screening tests are designed to detect antibodies to the virus, not the virus itself, such tests will only pick up infection in those who have developed antibodies, which most people don't make until several weeks to several months after infection.

Agwu cautions that "if a teen engages in risky behaviors and has symptoms of flu or mononucleosis, pediatricians should look further and not be lulled into a false sense of security by a negative rapid HIV test."

Because an estimated 14 teenagers become infected with HIV every day in the United States, because ARS is both under-reported and underdiagnosed and because early infections are highly contagious, ARS should be on every pediatrician's radar screen, Agwu says.

To rule out HIV in teens deemed to be at high risk for sexually transmitted infections, Johns Hopkins HIV experts recommend the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, which directly detect the virus' genetic markers, rather than antibodies to the virus.

PCR tests, while more expensive than standard antibody tests, can detect the virus within two to three weeks after it enters the body.

"Am I suggesting that every teen with flu-like symptoms should get a PCR? No. But I am suggesting that pediatricians take an extra minute to ask probing questions about risk behaviors and exposures in the last two months," Agwu says. "If the answers make you suspicious, then order the PCR."

Consider ordering a PCR test if the patient is sexually active or has used injectible drugs and has two or more of the following symptoms:

-- enlarged lymph nodes, a particularly telling sign

-- night sweats, another key finding

-- malaise, fatigue, headaches or a rash

-- fever and chills

-- persistent or recurrent sore throat and/or cough

Source: Johns Hopkins Medicine

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our hiv / aids section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Johns Hopkins Medicine. "HIV Antibody Tests Unreliable For Early Infections In Teens." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 24 Jun. 2009. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/155103.php>

APA
Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2009, June 24). "HIV Antibody Tests Unreliable For Early Infections In Teens." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/155103.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.




HIV / AIDS

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our HIV News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our HIV / AIDS Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »