HPV Testing For Cervical Screening Investigated
Main Category: Cervical Cancer / HPV VaccineAlso Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 26 Jun 2009 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
New research, published in The Lancet Oncology, has found that combining human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with routine liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening does not increase the detection of cervical cancer compared with LBC screening alone. The trial funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme aimed to determine whether testing for HPV in the cervix might increase the effectiveness of the cervical screening programme.
Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women under 35 years old, with about 2,800 women overall being diagnosed each year in the UK leading to about 1,000 deaths. Current screening relies on cervical smear tests processed with LBC and prevents around 70 per cent of cervical cancers. Previous research has indicated that HPV testing might help identify additional cases that are not detected by smears.
The £1.4 million study led by Professor Henry Kitchener, University of Manchester, is the first to compare the addition of HPV testing to cytology with cytology alone in primary cervical screening. More than 24,000 women were recruited for the study and given an HPV test. They were then randomly assigned to have their HPV result either revealed and acted on or concealed while they continued with standard treatment. Women in the revealed group who were HPV positive and had a negative smear were retested after 12 months and treatment was offered if necessary. All women were invited for a second screening test 36 months after they attended their first screen.
Overall, over the two screening rounds the addition of an HPV test to cytology did not lead to the detection of more high-grade lesions than cytology alone. Although the findings suggest there was no additional benefit when combining cytology with HPV testing, the NIHR HTA programme has agreed to fund the trial for a further three years to determine whether it would be possible for screening intervals to be extended in those with a negative HPV test. For more information visit http://www.hta.ac.uk/1710
"The results of our trial should help bring clarity to this area and inform the further development of national policy on the role of HPV testing and the NHS cervical screening programme," says Professor Kitchener, "and with three further years of research we hope to be able to add to this evidence and address issues such as the psychological impact of HPV testing and its cost-effectiveness."
To view The Lancet Oncology paper visit here. The full results are due to publish in the Health Technology Assessment journal series in October 2009. For details or to register to be alerted when it published visit http://www.hta.ac.uk/1162
Source
The Lancet Oncology
Visit our cervical cancer / hpv vaccine section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/155448.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/155448.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




