Public Backs New Plans To Protect Children From Tobacco
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingAlso Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 05 Jul 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.67 (9 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
New research shows that 70 per cent of adults in the UK back proposals to protect children from tobacco by putting it out of sight in shops and 76 per cent support abolishing cigarette vending machines according to Cancer Research UK today (Wednesday) - on the second anniversary of the smoking ban in England.
The survey* - carried out by YouGov - questioned more than 2000 people from across the UK and shows that nearly 80 per cent of people support the smoking ban in the UK's pubs, clubs and enclosed public places.
Those who had never smoked were most supportive of the ban and new proposals, with smokers showing the lowest levels of support. Women were also more likely than men to support the ban and new measures.
Other new results also show the 2007 smoking ban in England was followed by a rapid decline in smoking prevalence for about 9 months, amounting to 800,000 fewer smokers. The Smoking Toolkit Study ** tracks smoking on a monthly basis and follows progress from before the ban to the present. Comparing smoking trends before and after the ban researchers have been able to calculate the extra number of smokers who quit.
Smokefree legislation was introduced across the UK first in Scotland in March 2006, Wales in April 2007, Northern Ireland in April 2007 and then England in July 2007. The laws now provide all workers with a smokefree environment safe from the dangers of secondhand smoke, as well as the extra benefit of helping smokers break their addiction to tobacco.
Professor Robert West, Cancer Research UK's director of tobacco studies at the Health behaviour Research Centre at UCL and who leads the Smoking Toolkit Study, said: "The smoke-free law has been a huge boost to smokers trying to quit, but radical action is now needed to build on this success."
Tobacco kills half of all long term smokers. Every single day around 450 under-18s start smoking across the UK and more than eight out of 10 smokers start before they are 19.
Elspeth Lee, Cancer Research UK's head of tobacco control, said: "Smokefree laws have been a real success - not only in protecting UK workers from secondhand smoke but also in helping smokers to quit. These results show there's huge public support for the new measures to protect young people from tobacco marketing.
"Stopping the next generation from becoming smokers is a priority if we are to prevent more deaths from a product that has already caused far too many deaths. The public want this and research has shown that future generations will demand it."
Source
Cancer Research UK
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/156342.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/156342.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Produce The Research Then - Smoking Article
posted by nannyknowsbest on 5 Jul 2009 at 2:23 pmQuote: -
"New research shows that 70 per cent of adults in the UK back proposals to protect children from tobacco by putting it out of sight in shops"
I is a well know fact that Yougov have the "demographic" of all those that it surveys. This means that, before undertaking this survey, they will have known the general views and habits of those invited to take part - thus skewing the results in favour of the required outcome.
To somehow extrapolate the statement that "70% of the public are in favour ....." is verging on criminal and is certainly not based on peer reviewed science - or even any kind of meaningful survey. 2000 out of 61,000,000 is NOT a public survey - it hardly even a percentage for goodness sake.
Why do you feel justified in producing such headlines based on nothing? You then launch into all the sordid details (most also unfounded) about smoking. The entire smoking ban was brought about by a survey of 1200 people (also "vetted" to give the desired results) and then, everything that has decimated our leisure industry (8 pubs a day closing and at least 70 suicides to date) is based on these unproven (in the real world) "facts".
I am not saying that smoking is good and, perhaps it should be curtailed but, do not insult my intelligence by "proving it" by producing unfounded and unproven science. If anyone has died from second hand smoking then I, for one, will happily stop fighting for out pubs (being an occasional smoker) if you can name them and produce the, peer reviewed proof.
For my entire life, I have been involved in engineering and electronics and earned most of my living in the birth of the IT industry. If we had taken the same cavalier attitude to the truth that you appear to be taking, I would not be able to send this email.
Own up or produce the peer reviewed "proof" of you claims - otherwise, you must be on my side - unless there is another agenda that I am not aware of.
Think Of A Number
posted by Dave Atherton on 6 Jul 2009 at 12:51 am.....then add a few more on for luck. I see Professor West has misplaced his peer reviewed notes for this article. Firstly if you ask the equivalent questions like "when did you stop beating your wife" you are bound to come up with lurid figures like 80%. Also do not confuse restrictions from bans. If this question was posed would 80% of people object? "Would you have any objection to a cigar private members club?" Or "Should separate, ventilated smoking rooms in pubs be allowed?"
UK Government (ONS) statistics suggested that 67% of people wanted choice. Also in 2003 a survey in Edinburgh, sponsored by Nicontinell the nicotine replacement brand (so hardly biased) found that "According to the local street poll conducted in the city by Nicotinell, more than half - 52 per cent - were against a total ban."
Also Professor West is misleading us on smoker prevalence. In Britain and Ireland smoking has increased since the bans and even I will concede worryingly, youth smoking is up, I believe smoking should be an adult past time for over 18s, or at least 16.
"The ban on smoking in public has failed to increase the number of people quitting, a report revealed yesterday.
The proportion of men who smoke has actually risen since the ban in July last year while there was no change at all among women."
"The number of young people smoking in Scotland has returned to a level last seen nearly 10 years ago, according to a report by health officials."
"New figures from the Department of Health put the overall smoking rate at 29%, compared to 27% in 2002.
The rate of smoking is higher among women at 31%, compared to 27% of men.
Smoking is also more popular among younger age groups, with more than one-third of 18- to 29-year-olds now engaging in the habit."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1095784/Smoking-ban-fails-curb-habit-Figures-reveal-men-smoking-MORE.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7791012.stm
http://www.argus.ie/breaking-news/national-news/smoking-rate-up-from-27-to-29-since-2002-1774733.html
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





