Agave Nectar Does Not Comply With FDA Labeling Laws
Main Category: Nutrition / DietAlso Included In: Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals
Article Date: 06 Jul 2009 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.35 (55 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.55 (62 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
Agave nectar is an alternative sweetener used in health food bars and sold as a replacement for sugar, honey and maple syrup. Alternative health writer Ramiel Nagel has announced today that agave nectar does not contain a correct label as required by FDA labeling laws.
"Agave nectar contains 70%-75% highly chemically refined fructose-more than is present in high fructose corn syrup-and most consumers don't know this," explained Mr. Nagel. Once eaten, refined fructose appears as triglycerides in the bloodstream, or is stored as body fat. Elevated triglyceride levels, caused by consumption of refined fructose, is one of the factors responsible for the hardening of human arteries. Further, metabolic studies have proven the relationship between refined fructose consumption and obesity.
Fructose in agave nectar is a man-made synthetic sugar produced through a complex process of enzyme hydrolysis which converts non-sweet starches and sugars into a highly refined sweetener, fructose. Russ Bianchi, Managing Director and CEO of Adept Solutions, Inc., a globally recognized food and beverage development firm, explains, "By eating high fructose syrups, you are clogging the arteries, creating inflammation, and increasing body fat, while stressing your heart. This is in part because refined fructose is foreign to the body, and is not recognized by it."
A confidential letter from the FDA explains that agave nectar is supposed to be labeled as "hydrolyzed inulin syrup," to reveal its true nature. Yet as of today, no agave manufacturers comply with the FDA's labeling requirement. These manufacturers are not adhering to the law, and as a result, consumers are unaware of the high fructose content of agave nectar.
Nagel's research reveals that due to its high fructose content agave nectar may not be safe for pregnant women, and that when used frequently it may cause body chemistry imbalances that can promote poor health, in the same why high fructose corn syrup would. Please contact us to learn more.
Source
Ramiel Nagel
Visit our nutrition / diet section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/156397.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/156397.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
FDA Is Highly Disfunctional
posted by Lesa Rand on 19 May 2010 at 1:20 pmI think it criminal to defraud the public in this way. FDA is highly disfunctional and needs to clean how. Agri-business is out of control and too well connected. With an assist from the FDAs they're able to undermine public health. What's happened to America, formally the greatness nation in the world? Truly sad and unfortunate.
FDA Confidential Letter
posted by Braulio Trujillo on 10 Sep 2010 at 8:32 amDoes anyone know where we could find this "confidential letter", Mr. Nagel is talking about? I would definitely like to see the whole document.
Thanks.
It's not just Agave Nectar!
posted by Joshua Naterman on 1 Feb 2011 at 4:50 pmThank you for the report, I just did research into the chemical composition of agave nectar to see what it was and that's how I came across this page.
I think it's ridiculous that the nutrition community at large seem to focus on high fructose corn syrup without mentioning that sucrose, honey and maple syrup are all more or less equally bad. The agave nectar is obviously a bit worse which is a huge problem since it, like crystalline fructose, is being marketed at diabetics, who are only going to get worse if they start increasing fructose consumption. To allow fructose to continue to be used as a sweetener in its various forms and carriers is directly harming the American people. In fact, under the Patriot Act that could be considered a form of terrorism. I am willing to bet that will never see the front page, but it is what it is.
I think the bottom line here is that we the concerned people of America need to start organizing a campaign to demand that the FDA become responsible for controlling chronic toxins as well as acute toxins. This would force the FDA to crack down on the use of fructose.
Maltitol is also nearly as bad as sugar when it comes to blood sugar spikes and has nearly equal kcal per gram, and while that is technically a different issue than the one raised here it is another example of the FDA flat out failing the American citizenry, whom it was created to protect.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







