Scrap England's "Shameful" Prescription Charge, Urges DTB
Main Category: Public HealthArticle Date: 07 Jul 2009 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
The prescription charge in England is a tax in all but name - and an unfair one at that - and should be axed, says Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin (DTB).
England is the only one of the four UK countries that has either not already scrapped the charge or plans to do so by April 2011.
DTB argues that, contrary to popular belief, the £7.20 currently levied on prescription medicines does not directly reflect the cost of the drug prescribed and does not specifically fund health services.
Instead, the charge is for raising general tax revenue, it says.
With the abolition of the charge in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, a key argument put forward for its retention - namely that it reminds people of the cost of medicines, and acts as a deterrent to overuse prescription services - rings hollow, says DTB.
"Why only people in England need such a reminder is far from clear," it says.
Those who support the charge argue that many people are exempt. But these exemptions are totally illogical, says DTB. And they are so confusing that even NHS Prescription Services is setting up an online quiz for healthcare professionals to test their knowledge about whom they should and should not be charging.
The other concern that advocates for the retention of the charge advance is that its abolition might prompt patients to demand medicines "of dubious value." The counter argument is that if these products are so questionable, they should not be available for prescription in the first place, insists DTB.
Having demolished the arguments in support of keeping the prescription charge in England, DTB concludes: "[It] is a poorly conceived, manifestly unfair tax that shames the NHS and the Department of Health. It needs to go."
Source
Drug And Therapeutics Bulletin
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/156602.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/156602.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






