Bill Fuels Debate Over Universal Screening For Postpartum Depression
Main Category: DepressionAlso Included In: Pregnancy / Obstetrics; Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 15 Jul 2009 - 5:00 PDT
A bill (HR 20, S 324) in Congress that would mandate funding for research, services and public education related to postpartum depression has sparked debate over whether all women should be screened for the condition, Time reports. The Melanie Blocker-Stokes Postpartum Depression Research and Care Act, also known as the Mothers Act, passed the House and is before the Senate. The bill does not specifically include funding for PPD testing, though an earlier version did; regardless, critics say it would still lead to greater screening. According to Time, the issue at the center of the debate is whether PPD screening identifies actual cases "or simply contribute[s] to the potentially dangerous medicalization of motherhood." Ingrid Johnston-Robledo, director of women's studies at the State University of New York, said that experts on both sides of the debate agree about increased support for women. "The problem with women's reproductive health issues is that they tend to be ignored or exaggerated," Johnston-Robledo said. She added, "We need to find a way to come down in the middle: acknowledge women's depression but not assume that all women who struggle with the transition to motherhood are depressed."
Critics of the bill argue that mental health screenings are notorious for giving false positives. They also contend that increased testing is a bid by pharmaceutical companies to sell more medication to women who do not need it. Some psychologists argue that universal PPD screening would be misdirected because the greatest risk factor for the condition is previous depression, not giving birth. Paula Caplan, a clinical and research psychologist, said, "(We) should be addressing the social factors causing women to be upset after they give birth, not locating the problem within the women."
Some proponents of PPD screening say it is not supposed to be used as a diagnostic tool but as a way to identify which patients require further evaluation. According to Time, studies suggest that PPD affects as many as one out of seven women who have recently given birth and that leaving it untreated exposes women and their infants to unwarranted risk. Katherine Wisner, a psychiatrist at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, said, "Postpartum depression is not a benign, uncommon thing." She added, "We screen all infants for (the genetic disorder) phenylketonuria, which is extremely rare. Why don't we screen women for this?" (Elton, Time, 7/20).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2009 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our depression section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/157591.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/157591.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Over 50+ Women's Advocates And Professionals Disappointed In TIME Article
posted by Lauren Hale on 16 Jul 2009 at 9:44 pmTo whom it may concern:
When the TIME article, "The Melancholy of Motherhood" was first published online, myself and several others immediately rallied to send TIME a letter to point out many of the article's shortcomings. This letter, authored by none other than Katherine Stone of Postpartum Progress, advises TIME of several mistakes and oversights within the article. Those signing the letter include Susan Dowd-Stone, Carole Blocker, George Parnham, Shoshana Bennett, Mary Jo Codey and many other dedicated women advocates and professionals. All of us were deeply disheartened by the lack of information and one-sided presentation of this debate by TIME Magazine.
I am even further disappointed to read an even more lacking rehash of an already inaccurate article here at Medical News Today, a normally reliable resource.
I sincerely hope readers of this article will also choose to click the following URL to read our Open Letter to TIME in order to obtain further facts and information regarding the MOTHER'S Act and the TIME article: http://postpartumprogress.typepad.com/weblog/2009/07/open-letter-to-time-magazine-about-postpartum-depression.html
Warmest,
Lauren Hale
Repetitive Strain Injuries
posted by Repetitive Strain Injuries on 26 Jan 2011 at 3:15 amOne of the problems of fully understanding the psychological and psychosomatic factors is that a number of repetitive strain injuries are “non-anatomical” – meaning that the physical symptoms are not apparent under medical investigation.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




