Medicaid Expansion: Health Care Reform's Newest Challenge
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPArticle Date: 22 Jul 2009 - 4:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
"Until the nation's governors staged a public revolt last weekend, few people were paying attention to one of the most far-reaching proposals being considered as part of overhauling the health care system: a dramatic expansion and redefinition of the Medicaid program," Time reports. "Redefining who is eligible for Medicaid would be one of the major means by which lawmakers hope to achieve universal health coverage - which is one of the reasons that Governors, whose budgets already are straining under the program's growing costs, are so wary of the idea."
The Medicaid proposal, which "came to a boil as the National Governors Association met in Biloxi, Miss., could "hardly come at a worse time for the Governors. The recession has drained state coffers of tax receipts, even as public need for state safety-net services is growing. According to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, at least 48 states are facing shortfalls totaling $166 billion - which is 24% of their total budgets. ... Nor, it seems, could the governors' rebellion have come at a worse time for President Obama's health-care-reform effort, which is being hit from every side by growing doubts."
Currently, many low-income adults are not eligible for Medicaid, but they could be if Congress decides to "make income alone the determinant of Medicaid coverage. Under the health reform bill now being considered by the House, all non-elderly people earning at or below 133% of poverty - about $14,400 for an individual, and $29,300 for a family of four - would be eligible." The House bill would have the federal government "pick up the entire cost of those newly covered under Medicaid - $438 billion over 10 years," while a Senate finance draft version "would have the feds paying the additional cost for only five years, after which the states would have to pick up their typical share of existing Medicaid costs, which averages over 40%" (Tumulty, 7/21).
NPR interviewed Gov. Jim Douglas, R-Vt., who heads the National Governors Association. Douglas "says at 24 percent, his state has one of the highest rates of Medicaid enrollment in the nation. Douglas tells Robert Siegel that in Vermont, Medicaid costs $1.2 billion, a burden that is shared by the state and federal governments." He "estimates that by the end of the next decade, 25 percent across the nation will be enrolled in the program, and, unless costs are controlled, that figure could approach 30 percent. 'That really clouds out all the other responsibilities of state government,' he says" (7/20).
This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.
© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/158366.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/158366.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




