Leading Medical Organizations Issue Revised Policy Statement On Learning Disabilities And Dyslexia
Main Category: Eye Health / BlindnessAlso Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 28 Jul 2009 - 0:00 PDT
The American Academy of Ophthalmology announced that it has issued a revised policy statement on Learning Disabilities, Dyslexia, and Vision. The revised statement, which was issued jointly with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) and the American Association of Certified Orthoptists (AACO), expands upon the previous policy and includes extensive scientific references. The statement was also published today in Pediatrics, the journal of the AAP.
"Dyslexia and learning disabilities are complex problems that have no simple solutions," said Sheryl Handler, M.D., a pediatric ophthalmologist who helped revise the statement. "This policy statement applies the available evidence to develop recommended steps for the best possible outcome for children with these disabilities. We hope that the statement will be helpful for the physicians who play an important role in the care of children with learning disabilities."
Learning disabilities affect an estimated 2.6 million children between the ages of 6 to 11. Approximately 80 percent of people with learning disabilities have dyslexia, a primary reading disorder that is language-based. It is an abnormality in the word analysis pathways of the brain that interferes with its ability to convert written words into spoken words. Early identification and referral to qualified professionals are essential. Children with learning disabilities should receive individualized, evidence-based educational interventions combined with psychological and medical treatments as needed.
"Currently, there is no adequate scientific evidence to support the view that subtle eye or visual problems cause learning disabilities," the policy states. Numerous studies have shown that children with dyslexia or related learning disabilities have the same visual function and ocular health as children without such conditions," the statement notes. "Specifically, subtle eye or visual problems…do not cause dyslexia. In summary, research has shown that most reading disabilities are not caused by altered visual function."
The statement also notes that there is no scientific evidence to support the use of vision therapy or tinted lenses or filters as effective direct or indirect treatments for learning disabilities. There is no valid evidence that children participating in vision therapy are more responsive to educational instruction than children who do not participate. "The claim that vision therapy improves visual efficiency cannot be substantiated," the policy states. "Diagnostic treatment and approaches that lack scientific evidence of efficacy are not endorsed or recommended."
The policy statement is available here. More information about vision therapy for learning disabilities is available here.
Source
American Academy of Ophthalmology
Visit our eye health / blindness section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/158921.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/158921.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Throwing The Baby Out With The Bath Water
posted by John Hayes on 22 Sep 2009 at 8:48 amI can understand the frustration of having to read ads for expensive dyslexia treatments which claim to be backed by scientific research and by any standard over promote the products as helping every educational problem possible .
Visual Therapy claims success for all learning disabilities after an extended time and offer some educational programs along with it .
Irlen lenses are more specific claiming help to dyslexics ,autism, ADHD and even good readers.
That there doesn't seem to be a need for those interventions to actually diagnose their clients as having the problems they claim to "cure" is certainly a red flag.
That the scientific studies that claim to prove their claims are not good enough to stand up to scientific review standards is another red flag.
These doctors seem to be immune to charges of malpractice which also seems unfair. Being financially damaged should be cause for some type of recourse by patients who receive no benefit. But in their defense NO REFUNDS ALLOWED is the posted policy.
There was a couple of serious flaws in the argument against vision not being related to learning disabilities.
The first flaw is that it is improper to say a study/s are so poorly done that their conclusions are worthless and then turn around and say that those studies actually proved the opposite. Poorly done studies prove nothing!
I suggest that there is visual condition that does make reading difficult for perhaps 1% of the general population.
Helen Irlen does give a fair description of that visual condition. Dr G Eden now president of the IDA also did fMRI studies of the visual centers of the brain and published in her report about a little girl that said " I could read if only the words would stop walking."
Helen's method has always been known to have a high failure rate and lack any financial guarantees. But the fact is that she has indeed had some real success stories with people having trouble seeing print.
I also think that when she kept herself to working with people with problems seeing text and was having some success she was ignored. Vision therapy also existed at a small level for years and then exploded into the cure all for learning disabilities. Then Helen started to branch out th ADHD and Autism and it became time to knock down educational snake oil salesmen.
When you make blanket statements about vision and learning disabilities you are ignoring visual dyslexia and the problems some people have with seeing text is a clear stable and uniform manner. It is a small minority and I use a strict criteria to define visual dyslexia. Visual dyslexia is a condition where the person can describe visual problems that make reading difficult after be checked out by a normal eye doctor
My name is John Hayes and by developing universal visual dyslexia filters which have eliminated the need for a personal evaluation and are so successful that I offer a money back guarantee.
My See Right Dyslexia Glasses also restore normal depth perception for those visual dyslexics with poor depth perception. The restoration of normal depth perception happens immediately when my glasses are put on and then comes back when they are removed.
I believe your statement about vision and learning disabilities was an emotional attack against 2 intervention methods you thought overstepped the bounds of reason.
That does not give you the right to misrepresent relevant facts. It is obvious that the authors are not research oriented types. It was a poor slapped together statement with no real thought put into it.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




