Why Measuring Absolute Risk Of Fracture Could Save Many Broken Bones
Main Category: Bones / OrthopedicsArticle Date: 29 Jul 2009 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
A person's absolute risk of fracture over the next 5 or 10 years can be predicted with reasonable accuracy according to their age, sex, bone density and history of fractures and falls.
While not an exact science, risk predictions allow people to make more informed choices about whether or not they will seek or accept treatment.
In Australia, the Government pays for preventative treatment based primarily on whether or not someone has already sustained a fracture. The problem with this approach is that many of those at high risk of future fracture have no history of prior fracture.
The Government also provides treatment for those 70 years or older with very low bone density, even without a fracture, and in some other situations such as high-dose, long-term corticosteroid use.
However, over 50% of women and 70% of men who fracture do not have osteoporosis, and do not have any prior history of fracture. So many people at high risk of fracture are not aware of their risk, and nor are their doctors. If they were aware of that risk, they may decide to make lifestyle changes, or pay for treatment themselves.
Dr Sunita Sandhu, Professor Tuan Nguyen, Professor John Eisman and Dr Nguyen Nguyen from the Garvan Institute of Medical Research have compared the performance of Garvan's fracture risk calculator (http://www.fractureriskcalculator.com), launched early last year, with one released by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Their findings are published in Osteoporosis International, now online.
In a 'matched case-control study', 69 women with a fracture were matched against 75 women without a fracture, and 31 men with a fracture were matched against 25 men without a fracture.
"We can see very clearly that our model predicts fracture at least as well as the WHO model when applied to an Australian population, and apparently more accurately for Australian men," said Professor Nguyen.
The Garvan fracture risk calculator is based on gender, bone mineral density, age, history of personal fracture, and history of falls.
The WHO model ignores falls, but includes height, weight, personal history of fracture, family history of fracture, smoking, alcohol consumption, use of corticosteroids, rheumatoid arthritis and secondary osteoporosis.
According to Professor Nguyen, "the results suggest that the criteria in the Garvan calculator combine the most critical risk factors."
"Our model allows clinicians to combine four risk factors to estimate the risk of fracture within the next 5 to 10 years for an individual man or woman. People can then make decisions about treatment based on that knowledge."
"In the future we will be able to incorporate genetic information as a useful additional criterion, once we have more clearly established which genes are involved in fracture risk."
"In other fields such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer, treatment is now based on an individual's absolute risk of having a disease. In osteoporosis, we are gradually moving in that direction."
About Garvan
The Garvan Institute of Medical Research was founded in 1963. Initially a research department of St Vincent's Hospital in Sydney, it is now one of Australia's largest medical research institutions with nearly 500 scientists, students and support staff. Garvan's main research programs are: Cancer, Diabetes & Obesity, Immunology and Inflammation, Osteoporosis and Bone Biology, and Neuroscience. The Garvan's mission is to make significant contributions to medical science that will change the directions of science and medicine and have major impacts on human health. The outcome of Garvan's discoveries is the development of better methods of diagnosis, treatment, and ultimately, prevention of disease.
Source
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Visit our bones / orthopedics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/159069.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/159069.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
Risk Of Fracture? Strontium Citrate.
posted by Mystral on 5 Aug 2009 at 5:11 amOne way to treat this problem is by way of prevention. How? Strontium Citrate. Stuff works and has been working since Roman gladiatorial times. When, the 'super' gladiators took Strontium Citrate to increment good bone turnover and to strengthen existing bone.
Strontium Citrate is cheap and is available over the counter - that is why pharma has largely *ignored the product, excepting for Servier, in their Protelos Strontium Ranelate, who then went on to ruin a good product by buffering it with Aspartame...idiocy.
There are few side effects attached to Strontium Citrate as opposed to the terrible side effects attached to those Bisphosphonate drugs...that don't work and that 'can' cuase osteonecrosis, jaw bone death!
BTW: In France, ALL dentists and dental clinics at ALL hospitals require that patients sign a form as to their taking of those BIS drugs - as taking BIS drugs can and has been shown to lead to Osteonecrosis, jaw bone death. You can check out the information on the internet - just don't bother with the drug sites as they are marketing hype. Hype, pushing the drugs, willy-nilly and attempting to brush the facts of the matter under the carpet.
Strontium Citrate can cause some mild constipation - which is easily dealt with! Strontium Citrate is available *over the counter*, but always check with yr GP et al before taking supplements - you may have a condition not condusive to taking several supplements. So, be wise, and check it out. (Though chances are that that GP/physician will never have even heard of Strontium Citrate...!)
Go well.
Strontium For Osteoporosis
posted by BoneLady on 8 Sep 2009 at 8:08 amI totally agree that strontium citrate is a safer alternative than bisphosphonates for treating osteoporosis. I tried Fosamax once weekly but discontinued it due to debilitating side effects. I have been taking strontium citrate for a year and a half, with significant improvement in my DXA scan.
I have never heard of Roman gladiators taking strontium citrate. I wish Mystral had cited a source. This would be a great read!
I experienced mild constipation with strontium citrate, but dealt with it by increasing my fiber. This is the only negative side effect I have had.
Servier added aspartame to Protelos (strontium ranelate) as a sweetener because their product is a powder that must be dissolved in water. Many people object to aspartame, which has several possible negative health consequences.
I keep a journal of my progress in combatting osteoporosis. I also keep up with the latest research on strontium.
Strontium
posted by Rondi on 12 Nov 2009 at 8:25 amFound the above opinions interesting. Two companies I have researched are selling strontium as part of a whole foods bone builder (including Vit.D, K, calcium, magnesium etc.) apparently, it is important to take strontium away from calcium on an empty stomach. the two companies are Algae and Garden of Life. I have hep C and the strontium plus I've been taking doesn't agree with me too well.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




