Lords' Science Committee Publish Follow-Up Report On Pandemic Flu, UK
Main Category: Swine FluAlso Included In: Flu / Cold / SARS; Public Health
Article Date: 30 Jul 2009 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee has published it follow-up report on Pandemic Influenza. The follow-up inquiry, which was begun in November 2008 before the emergence of swine flu, has evolved in the course of the inquiry as the new threat of the H1N1 has become apparent.
While the report praises the Government's actions in stockpiling antivirals such as Tamiflu and entering into advance purchase agreements for pandemic specific vaccines. The Committee criticise other aspects of the Government's preparations for the swine flu pandemic. Some of the criticisms the Committee make include:
* The Committee want clarity on how intensive and critical care facilities would be expected to perform in a pandemic and where there are weaknesses in critical care provision which should be addressed.
* The Committee have 'significant concerns' about the delay in the operation of the National Pandemic Flu Service (NPFS) and ask the Government to explain this delay. They also seek assurances that the service will be able to meet anticipated demand and be fully operational by autumn to meet the challenges of the anticipated 'second wave' of swine flu.
* The Committee are disappointed the process of 'whole system' testing (examining how the full range of health services could react in a pandemic) was not carried our earlier.
* The Committee ask the Government to clarify what interim services are in place until the 'enhanced' NPFS comes on-stream and to make clear how the service will interact with NHS Direct.
* The report calls on the Government to clarify how they will ensure NHS staff are supported in providing services that may be outside their areas of expertise and if they will be protected from legal action when they provide this treatment. The Committee also want better guidance on ethical decisions on who could have access to limited flu treatments/vaccines.
Commenting Lord Sutherland, Chairman of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, said:
"While the Government have got some things right in preparing for a flu pandemic, such as the stockpiling of antivirals, there are other areas where we appear to be under prepared.
"We are particularly concerned that the 'enhanced' NPFS or 'flu line' is not fully operational and there seems to be a lack of clarity about how the 'interim' flu line will interact with NHS Direct.
"We were surprised and disappointed that the Government had not undertaken 'whole system' testing of health services preparations for a flu pandemic before swine flu emerged."
Source
House of Lords
Visit our swine flu section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/159214.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/159214.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



