Carboxytherapy And Mesotherapy Unproven - Physician Group Urges Consumers To Be Aware Of Non-approved Cosmetic Injections
Main Category: Cosmetic Medicine / Plastic SurgeryAlso Included In: Dermatology
Article Date: 02 Aug 2009 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.9 (10 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.25 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 4 posts |
The Physicians Coalition for Injectable Safety issued a consumer warning about carboxytherapy and mesotherapy injections. These products, touting everything from cellulite treatment to weight loss are not FDA approved, and do not have clinical data that demonstrates results or safety.
Carboxytherapy uses carbon dioxide gas injected under the skin to reduce the look of cellulite, treatment of dark under-eye circles, and stretch marks and is also touted for fat sculpting on the face and the body. "Although many websites or providers claim carboxytherapy is safe and FDA approved, it has not been clinically tested or FDA approved for these purposes," says Coalition leader Robert Weiss, MD of Baltimore, MD. "Carboxytherapy for use around the eyes is especially dangerous. It could potentially release gas bubbles into blood vessels causing blindness. In addition, the risks of putting carbon dioxide in your body are currently unknown."
Mesotherapy, also known as injection lipolysis, is a mixture of vitamins, drugs and enzymes that are compounded (mixed together) to make the injected substance. "There is no conclusive, authoritative information that exists, such as unbiased, peer-reviewed clinical studies that meets the standards of an accepted medical journal, measuring both the efficacy and safety of mesotherapy," says Coalition leader Mark Jewell, MD, Eugene, Oregon. "We don't know the safety or efficacy of these compounds and, until there exists credible evidence, consumers are advised not to have these injections."
The Coalition urges consumers to be very selective about cosmetic treatments, and the individuals who provide them. "Only accept treatment prescribed by a qualified physician and administered under that physician's supervision. Whether an injection or treatment is to treat aging conditions, to treat cellulite or a similar body contouring condition, whether it sounds reasonable or too good to be true, you should always be aware of false claims," says Coalition leader Jeffrey Kenkel, MD of Dallas, TX. "Verifying that the drug or device that is recommended for your injection is FDA approved is an important first step. It should be approved specifically for cosmetic use as prescribed or similarly to what is prescribed for you."
The Coalition offers consumers extensive, easy to use resources including a cosmetic injection planner with all the questions you must ask your provider at www.injectablesafety.org. In addition, an up-to-date listing of the status of investigational and approved cosmetic injection drugs and devices is available on the site, as well as pictures that will help consumers identify a genuine brand. In addition Consumers are urged to ask and consider these simple questions before considering any cosmetic injectable procedure:
- Doctor: Is the injectable recommended by a qualified doctor who regularly treats similar conditions, in an appropriately licensed and equipped medical facility? Has the doctor examined the prospective patient before recommending treatment?
- Brand: Is the injectable recommended approved by the U.S. FDA,, and by equivalent agencies in the country of origin, for cosmetic indications and is it appropriately labeled and packaged to reflect its authenticity and approval?
- Safety: Is the setting a proper medically-equipped office, with safety and sterilization procedures? Has the physician evaluated conditions, recommended treatment, offered alternatives and clearly defined the potential outcomes including any complications?
Source
The Physicians Coalition for Injectable Safety
Visit our cosmetic medicine / plastic surgery section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/159481.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/159481.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (4)
dermatologist
posted by alan on 3 Aug 2010 at 4:37 amThe Carboxytherapy is not a new technique. It is available in France since 1930. It is true that the application aesthetics is more recent (1980-1990). Many doctors use this technique throughout the world. So why the inaccuracy of this article?
Anatomy re-learning
posted by Carboxyworld.com on 12 Aug 2010 at 3:36 amCarboxytherapy has been studied since 1930 with a lot of clinical papers published by university professors (vascular indications mostly) (publications in French. It is possible that the Physicians Coalition does not read French...). They are right, very few studies have been published in the aesthetic field (only 3). YES Carboxytherapy still needs to be considered as an experimental procedure.
Now, journalists should verify press releases a bit. As everybody is asking for 'pseudo' proofs. Can they explain how 2 to 6 cc of CO2 injected into the dermis would dive in deeper subcutaneous skin layers, they swim all around the eye globe, then would create a breach in the central artery of the retina, then jump in to create an embolism which would lead to permanent blindness ... this wihout beeing absorbed during transport (see the risk of embolism due to co2 laparosopic accidental catherism of the neck arteries in pubmed so you can make your mind).
Yes CO2 is experimental but there is no need to talk about unproven risks to frighten people :)
risk of Air emphysema to make pressure on the optical eye nerve
posted by Carboxyworld.com on 21 Aug 2010 at 8:25 amWe may also have a risk of Air emphysema to make pressure on the optical eye nerve. Now we are dealing with very low quantities of CO2 and the intradermal injection layer is not supposed to lead to that pressure.
koshinska
posted by koshinska on 13 Aug 2011 at 11:16 pmMy friend and I had 12 carboxy therapy sessions each in a period of 2 months. We had different targets (arm volume reduction and smoothening of the tights). The only things that got reduced significantly were our bank accounts. No results for both of us!
The procedures are expensive, extremely PAINFUL and disappointingly NON-EFFECTIVE! Do not waste time and money!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





